Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36042897›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical biochemistry2022

Clinical evaluation of non-invasive prenatal screening in 32,394 pregnancies from Changzhi maternal and child health care hospital of Shanxi China.

XiaoZe Li, LiHong Wang, ZeRong Yao, FangYing Ruan, ZhiPeng Hu, WenXia Song

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical biochemistry, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

XiaoZe LiChangzhi Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital Affiliated Hospital of Changzhi Medical College, Department of Medical Genetic, Changzhi City, Shanxi Province, China.
LiHong WangChangzhi Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital Affiliated Hospital of Changzhi Medical College, Department of Medical Genetic, Changzhi City, Shanxi Province, China.
ZeRong YaoChangzhi Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital Affiliated Hospital of Changzhi Medical College, Department of Medical Genetic, Changzhi City, Shanxi Province, China.
FangYing RuanChangzhi Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital Affiliated Hospital of Changzhi Medical College, Department of Medical Genetic, Changzhi City, Shanxi Province, China.
ZhiPeng HuChangzhi Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital Affiliated Hospital of Changzhi Medical College, Department of Medical Genetic, Changzhi City, Shanxi Province, China.
WenXia SongChangzhi Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital Affiliated Hospital of Changzhi Medical College, Department of Medical Genetic, Changzhi City, Shanxi Province, China.
Changzhi Medical College · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Non-invasive prenatal screening (NIPS) is a highly sensitive and specific screening test to detect fetal chromosomal abnormalities. The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the NIPS as an effective method for prenatal detection of aneuploidies in both high-risk and low-risk pregnancies. Methods: In current study, we performed NIPS in 32,394 pregnancies, out of which results were available in 32,361 (99.9%) of them. Illumina sequencing was performed for NIPS screening. Hypothesis Z test was used to classify fetal autosomal aneuploidy of T21, T18, and T13. Karyotyping was performed to determine the true negative and true positive NIPS results. Results: Among the 32,361 confirmed samples, 164 cases had positive results and 32197 cases had negative results. Of these positive cases, 116 cases were trisomy 21, 34 cases were trisomy 18 and 14 cases were trisomy 13. No false negative results were found in this cohort. The overall sensitivity and specificity were 100% and 99.91%, respectively. There was no significant difference in test performance between the 7,316 high-risk and 25,045 low-risk pregnancies, (sensitivity, 100% vs 100% (P>0.05); specificity, 99.96% vs 99.95% (P > 0.05)). Factors contributing to false-positive results included fetal copy number variants (CNVs), fetal mosaicism and typically producing Z scores between 3 and 4. Moreover, we analyzed NIPS wholegenome sequencing to investigate the Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms (SNPs) associations with drug response or risk of disease. As compare to the 1000g East Asian genome data, the results revealed a significant difference in 7,285,418 SNPs variants of Shanxi pregnant women including 19,293 clinvar recorded variants and 7,266,125 non-clinvar recorded. Conclusions: Our findings showed that NIPS was an effective assay that may be applied as routine screening for fetal trisomies in the prenatal setting. In addition, this study also provides an accurate assessment of significant differences in 7,285,418 SNPs variants in Shanxi pregnant women that were previously unavailable to clinicians in Shanxi population.

Indexed as

false positiveNIPSSNPs variantstrisomytrue positiveZ score

Identifiers

PMID36042897
PMCPMC9375529
OpenAlexW4200079299

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.