Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36042871›Full record

ArticleHealth information science and systems2022

A framework for in-vivo human brain tumor detection using image augmentation and hybrid features.

Manika Jha, Richa Gupta, Rajiv Saxena

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health information science and systems, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Manika JhaDepartment of Electronics and Communication, Jaypee Institute of Information Technology, Noida, 201309 India.ORCID 0000-0003-0211-942X
Richa Gupta *Department of Electronics and Communication, Jaypee Institute of Information Technology, Noida, 201309 India.
Rajiv Saxena *Department of Electronics and Communication, Jaypee Institute of Information Technology, Noida, 201309 India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Brain tumor is caused by the uncontrolled and accelerated multiplication of cells in the brain. If not treated early enough, it can lead to death. Despite multiple significant efforts and promising research outcomes, accurate segmentation and classification of tumors remain a challenge. The changes in tumor location, shape, and size make brain tumor identification extremely difficult. An Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) algorithm using is proposed in this work to classify four subtypes of brain tumor-normal, gliomas, meningiomas, and pituitary tumors. Because the dataset was limited in size, image augmentation using a conditional Generative Adversarial Network (cGAN) was used to expand the training data. Deep features, Two-Dimensional Fractional Fourier Transform (2D-FrFT) features, and geometric features are fused together to extract both global and local information from the Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) scans. The model attained enhanced performance with a classification accuracy of 98.79% and sensitivity of 98.77% for the test images. In comparison to state-of-the-art algorithms employing the Kaggle brain tumor dataset, the suggested model showed a considerable improvement. The improved results show the prominence of feature fusion and establish XGBoost as an appropriate classifier for brain tumor detection in terms on testing accuracy, sensitivity and Area under receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) curve.

Indexed as

Brain tumor detectionDeep featuresFractional fourier featuresHybrid featuresXGBoost

Identifiers

PMID36042871
PMCPMC9420164

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.