Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36042783›Full record

ArticleAffective science2022

When and How to Regulate: Everyday Emotion-Regulation Strategy Use and Stressor Intensity.

Elisabeth S Blanke, Jennifer A Bellingtier, Michaela Riediger, Annette Brose

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Affective science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Elisabeth S BlankeDepartment of Psychology, Humboldt-Universität Zu Berlin, 10099 Berlin, Germany.
Jennifer A BellingtierDepartment of Developmental Psychology, Friedrich-Schiller-Universität Jena, Jena, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-5105-0153
Michaela RiedigerDepartment of Developmental Psychology, Friedrich-Schiller-Universität Jena, Jena, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-5206-3626
Annette BroseDepartment of Psychology, Humboldt-Universität Zu Berlin, 10099 Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-6774-2189

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Contextual factors shape emotion regulation (ER). The intensity of emotional stimuli may be such a contextual factor that influences the selection and moderates the effectiveness of ER strategies in reducing negative affect (NA). Prior research has shown that, on average, when emotional stimuli were more intense, distraction was selected over reappraisal (and vice versa). This pattern was previously shown to be adaptive as the preferred strategies were more efficient in the respective contexts. Here, we investigated whether stressor intensity predicted strategy use and effectiveness in similar ways in daily life. We examined five ER strategies (reappraisal, reflection, acceptance, distraction, and rumination) in relation to the intensity of everyday stressors, using two waves of experience-sampling data ( Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s42761-021-00087-1.

Indexed as

Emotion regulation choiceEmotion regulation flexibilityExperience samplingSituation-strategy fit (5/6)Stressor intensity

Identifiers

PMID36042783
PMCPMC9382984

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.