Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36042743›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2022

A modified LC-MS/MS method for the detection of whole blood tacrolimus and its clinical value in Chinese kidney transplant patients.

Ke-Wei Yu, Bing-Ling Li, Ying-Shi Yuan, Jia-Min Liao, Wei-Kang Li, Heng Dong, Pei-Feng Ke, Xing Jin, Lu Chen, Jing-Jing Zhao and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Ke-Wei YuDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Second Clinical Medical College, Guangzhou University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, China.
Bing-Ling LiGuangzhou KingMed Center for Clinical Laboratory Co., Ltd., KingMed College of Laboratory Medical of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510120, China.
Ying-Shi YuanDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Second Clinical Medical College, Guangzhou University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, China.
Jia-Min LiaoDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Second Clinical Medical College, Guangzhou University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, China.
Wei-Kang LiDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Second Clinical Medical College, Guangzhou University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, China.
Heng DongGuangzhou KingMed Center for Clinical Laboratory Co., Ltd., KingMed College of Laboratory Medical of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510120, China.
Pei-Feng KeDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Second Clinical Medical College, Guangzhou University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, China.
Xing JinDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Second Clinical Medical College, Guangzhou University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, China.
Lu ChenDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Second Clinical Medical College, Guangzhou University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, China.
Jing-Jing ZhaoDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510515, China.
Heng WangDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Second Clinical Medical College, Guangzhou University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, China.
Shun-Wang CaoDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Second Clinical Medical College, Guangzhou University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, China.
Wei-Ye ChenDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Second Clinical Medical College, Guangzhou University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, China.
Xian-Zhang HuangDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Second Clinical Medical College, Guangzhou University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, China.
Bei-Bei ZhaoGuangzhou KingMed Center for Clinical Laboratory Co., Ltd., KingMed College of Laboratory Medical of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510120, China.
Chun-Min KangDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Second Clinical Medical College, Guangzhou University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, China.
Guangzhou University · CNKingmed Diagnostics · CNNanfang Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: For patients who treated with tacrolimus after kidney transplant, therapeutic drug monitoring is essential to improve their prognosis. However, previous detection methods have limitations, such as the overestimation and unacceptable bias in the immunoassays. Precision medicine has been challenged. The liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) method is recognized as the gold standard due to its accuracy and specificity, but lack of throughput and complex process limits its clinical application. Therefore, an accurate, simple and high throughput method for tacrolimus monitoring is needed for clinical practice. Methods: A modified LC-MS/MS method was introduced and validated. Whole blood samples were prepared by a one-step protein precipitation method. Chromatographic separation was achieved using a Phenomenex Kinetex 2.6 μm XB-C18 2.1 × 50 mm column with a total run time of 3.5 min to avoid matrix effect. An electrospray ionization source (ESI) was used in positive ion multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) mode for mass spectrometric detection. In order to protect the mass spectrometer, only part of the sample after LC separation was allowed to enter the mass spectrum, through a two HPLC systems coupled one mass spectrometry design. In this way, the instrument throughput is also improved and realizing the detection of 2 samples within 3.5 min and carried out a shorter analyzing time for each sample of 1.75 min. Additionally, we calculated tacrolimus-intrapatient variant (Tac-IPV) based on this modified method and assessed the prognostic value of Tac-IPV in Chinese kidney transplant patients. Results: The LC-MS/MS was modified by streamlining the procedure and increasing the throughput. The method proved to be accurate and reproducible with all performance parameters suitably meeting the clinical requirements over a calibration ranged from 0.37 to 42.90 ng/mL. Parameters such as linearity, limit of quantification (LoQ) and dilution integrity were validated with a clinical reportable range from 0.37 to 343.20 ng/mL, which was particularly useful for high drug concentrations patients (rare but very serious). Both cross-contamination and matrix effects were negligible. Clinical data of 83 patients showed that Tac-IPV was associated with poor kidney transplant outcome in Chinese (Hazard Ratio (HR) = 3.96, 4.75; 95% Cl: 1.10-14.21, 1.23-18.36; Conclusions: This modified LC-MS/MS method possessed high throughput and simple sample preparation, allowing it to meet daily clinical needs. At the same time, Tac-IPV based on this modified LC-MS/MS had excellent prognostic value in kidney transplantation. These advantages have great significance for the individualized treatment of Chinese kidney transplant patients and broad application of Tac-IPV.

Indexed as

Intrapatient variabilityKidney transplantationLC-MS/MSTacrolimusTherapeutic drug monitoring

Identifiers

PMID36042743
PMCPMC9420483
OpenAlexW4291036716

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.