Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36042554›Full record

ArticleJournal of the National Cancer Institute2022

Incidence of in Situ vs Invasive Melanoma: Testing the "Obligate Precursor" Hypothesis.

Catherine M Olsen, Nirmala Pandeya, Philip S Rosenberg, David C Whiteman

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. A systematic review of microsimulation models for skin cancer.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Interleukin-1β Gene (Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2026
    Article
  4. Overdiagnosis of Melanoma In Situ.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Dermal Melanocytes Detectability for DistinguishingCurrent medicinal chemistry · 2025
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Identification of novel disulfidptosis-related lncRNA signatures to predict the prognosis and immune microenvironment of skin cutaneous melanoma patients.Skin research and technology : official journal of International Society for Bioengineering and the Skin (ISBS) [and] International Society for Digital Imaging of Skin (ISDIS) [and] International Society for Skin Imaging (ISSI) · 2024
    Article
  11. Continuing benefits of the Montreal Protocol and protection of the stratospheric ozone layer for human health and the environment.Photochemical & photobiological sciences : Official journal of the European Photochemistry Association and the European Society for Photobiology · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Overdiagnosis in Melanoma Screening: Is It a Real Problem?Dermatology practical & conceptual · 2023
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Obligate and Potential Precursors of Melanoma.Journal of the National Cancer Institute · 2022
    Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Catherine M OlsenCancer Control Group, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-4483-1888
Nirmala PandeyaCancer Control Group, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-1462-4968
Philip S RosenbergDivision of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6349-9126
David C WhitemanCancer Control Group, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-2563-9559
The University of Queensland · AUNational Cancer Institute · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMelanoma incidence has been rising in populations with predominantly European ancestry (White), speculated to be partly driven by heightened detection of indolent tumors. If in situ melanomas are destined to evolve to invasive cancers, detecting and removing them should deplete the pool of invasive lesions, and people with in situ melanoma should, on average, be younger than those with invasive melanoma.

methodsWe analyzed long-term incidence trends (1982-2018) for in situ and invasive melanomas in 3 predominantly White populations with high, medium, and low melanoma rates: Queensland (Australia), United States White, and Scotland. We calculated the incidence rate ratio (IRR) of in situ to invasive melanomas and estimated the contributions of age, period, and cohort effects. We compared age at diagnosis of in situ vs invasive melanomas overall and stratified by sex and anatomic site.

resultsIn all 3 populations, the in situ to invasive incidence rate ratio increased statistically significantly from less than 0.3 in 1982 to 1.95 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.88 to 2.02) in Queensland, 0.93 (95% CI = 0.90 to 0.96) in the US White population, and 0.58 (95% CI = 0.54 to 0.63) in Scotland in 2018. The mean age at diagnosis of in situ melanomas was the same or higher than invasive melanomas for almost all time periods among men and women and on all body sites except the lower limbs.

conclusionsThe increasing ratio of in situ to invasive melanoma incidence over time, together with the high (and increasing) mean age at diagnosis of in situ melanomas, is consistent with more indolent lesions coming to clinical attention than in previous eras.

Indexed as

MelanomaSkin NeoplasmsCutaneous Malignant MelanomaFemaleHumansIncidenceMaleQueenslandUnited States

Identifiers

PMID36042554
PMCPMC9552301
OpenAlexW4293773650

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.