Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36042530›Full record

ArticleGut pathogens2022

Clostridioides difficile toxin is infrequently detected in inflammatory bowel disease and does not associate with clinical outcomes.

Rachel Bernard, Muhammad B Hammami, Forest W Arnold, Brian Mcgrath, Alieysa Patel, Brandon Wuerth, Maribeth R Nicholson, Krishna Rao, Dejan Micic

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Gut pathogens, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Association ofWorld journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2025
    Article
  4. Observational
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Rachel BernardDivision of Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, Department of Pediatrics, Monroe Carell Jr. Vanderbilt Children's Hospital, Nashville, TN, USA.
Muhammad B HammamiDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, VA Loma Linda Healthcare System, Loma Linda, CA, USA.
Forest W ArnoldDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, USA.
Brian McgrathDivision of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, Department of Medicine, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, USA.
Alieysa PatelDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Brandon WuerthDivision of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, Department of Medicine, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, USA.
Maribeth R NicholsonDivision of Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, Department of Pediatrics, Monroe Carell Jr. Vanderbilt Children's Hospital, Nashville, TN, USA.
Krishna RaoDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Dejan MicicSection of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, Department of Medicine, University of Chicago Medicine, 5841 S. Maryland Ave. MC4076, Chicago, IL, 60654, USA. dmicic@medicine.bsd.uchicago.edu.
University of Louisville · USMonroe Carell Jr. Children's Hospital · USUniversity of Michigan–Ann Arbor · USUniversity of Chicago · USVA Loma Linda Healthcare System · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionClostridioides difficile infection (CDI) rates and outcomes can vary based on differences in testing strategy. Our aim was to assess the prevalence of toxin detection in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) when compared to those without IBD. Secondly, the clinical outcomes of CDI in IBD were assessed using two-step testing strategies.

methodsWe included patients undergoing CDI testing from four academic centers in the United States between January 1, 2018 and June 30, 2020. First the prevalence of toxin detection was compared between individuals with IBD and those without IBD. Secondly, among patients with IBD a primary composite outcome of abdominal colectomy, admission to an intensive care unit (ICU) or death within 30 days of C. difficile testing was assessed across the three categorical groups (screen positive/toxin positive, screen positive/toxin negative and screen negative assay) resulting from the two-step testing strategy.

resultsWhen comparing individuals with a positive screening assay, patients with IBD were less likely to have toxin detected by enzyme immunoassay (EIA) as compared to the non-IBD population (22/145 (15.2%) vs. 413/1144 (36.1%), p < 0.0001). Among all patients with IBD (n = 300), twenty-five (8.3%) had a screen positive assay/toxin positive assay, 136 (45.3%) had a screen positive/toxin negative assay and 139 (46.3%) had a negative screening assay. No significant difference in the primary composite outcome was detected across the three groups (p = 0.566).

conclusionWhen compared to those without IBD, patients with IBD have a reduced proportion of cases of C. difficile with toxin positivity. Differences in clinical outcomes among patients with IBD were not detected and limited by the infrequent detection of expressed toxin.

Indexed as

Clostridium difficileColitisInflammatory bowel disease

Identifiers

PMID36042530
PMCPMC9426007
OpenAlexW4293661309

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.