Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36042488›Full record

ArticleTrials2022

Control of Line Complications with KiteLock (CLiCK) in the critical care unit: study protocol for a multi-center, cluster-randomized, double-blinded, crossover trial investigating the effect of a novel locking fluid on central line complications in the critical care population.

Marlena Ornowska, Hubert Wong, Yongdong Ouyang, Anish Mitra, Aaron White, Sue Willems, Jessica Wittmann, Steven Reynolds

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in Trials, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04548713 (Control of Line Complications With KiteLock), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04548713 nacompletednot on this map

Control of Line Complications With KiteLock (CLiCK) in the Critical Care Unit

TypeinterventionalSponsorFraser HealthRan2022 to 2024Enrolled1,449ConditionsCentral Venous Catheter Thrombosis, Central Venous Catheter Related Bloodstream Infection, Catheter Complications, Catheter BlockageArms4% EDTA, Saline
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Marlena OrnowskaSimon Fraser University, Burnaby, Canada. mornowsk@sfu.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2635-1189
Hubert WongCenter for Health Evaluation and Outcome Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
Yongdong OuyangCenter for Health Evaluation and Outcome Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
Anish MitraUniversity of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
Aaron WhiteVaccine and Infectious Disease Organization, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Canada.
Sue WillemsFraser Health Authority, Surrey, Canada.
Jessica WittmannFraser Health Authority, Surrey, Canada.
Steven ReynoldsSimon Fraser University, Burnaby, Canada.
University of British Columbia · CAFraser Health · CASimon Fraser University · CAUniversity of Saskatchewan · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInsertion of a central venous access device (CVAD) allows clinicians to easily access the circulation of a patient to administer life-saving interventions. Due to their invasive nature, CVADs are prone to complications such as bacterial biofilm production and colonization, catheter-related bloodstream infection, occlusion, and catheter-related venous thrombosis. A CVAD is among the most common interventions for patients in the intensive care unit (ICU), exposing this vulnerable population to the risk of nosocomial infection and catheter occlusion. The current standard of care involves the use of normal saline as a catheter locking solution for central venous catheters (CVCs) and peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) lines, and a citrate lock for hemodialysis catheters. Saline offers little prophylactic measures against catheter complications. Four percent of tetrasodium ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) fluid (marketed as KiteLock Sterile Locking Solution™) is non-antibiotic, possesses antimicrobial, anti-biofilm, and anti-coagulant properties, and is approved by Health Canada as a catheter locking solution. As such, it may be a superior CVAD locking solution than the present standard of care lock in the ICU patient population.

methodsOur team proposes to fill this knowledge gap by performing a multi-center, cluster-randomized, crossover trial evaluating the impact of 4% tetrasodium EDTA on a primary composite outcome of the incidence rate of central line-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI), catheter occlusion leading to removal, and use of alteplase to resolve catheter occlusion compared to the standard of care. The study will be performed at five critical care units. DISCUSSION: If successful, the results of this study can serve as evidence for a shift of standard of care practices to include EDTA locking fluid in routine CVAD locking procedures. Completion of this study has the potential to improve CVAD standard of care to become safer for patients, as well as provides an opportunity to decrease strain on healthcare budgets related to treating preventable CVAD complications. Success and subsequent implementation of this intervention in the ICU may also be extrapolated to other patient populations with heavy CVAD use including hemodialysis, oncology, parenteral nutrition, and pediatric patient populations. On a global scale, eradicating biofilm produced by antibiotic-resistant bacteria may serve to lessen the threat of "superbugs" and contribute to international initiatives supporting the termination of antibiotic overuse.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT04548713, registered on September 9th, 2020.

Indexed as

Catheterization, Central VenousCatheter-Related InfectionsCentral Venous CathetersSepsisChildCritical CareCross-Over StudiesEdetic AcidHumansIntensive Care UnitsMulticenter Studies as TopicRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicEdetic AcidAlteplaseBiofilmCatheter colonizationCatheter lockingCatheter-related venous thrombosisCentral line-associated bloodstream infectionCentral line occlusionCentral venous access deviceClinical trialIntensive care unit

Identifiers

PMID36042488
PMCPMC9425798
OpenAlexW4293554382

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.