Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36042470›Full record

SynthesisBMC health services research2022

Direct medical costs of young-onset colorectal cancer: a worldwide systematic review.

Ria Garg, Vicki Cheng, Ursula Ellis, Vanay Verma, Helen McTaggart-Cowan, Stuart Peacock, Jonathan M Loree, Mohsen Sadatsafavi, Mary A De Vera

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC health services research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Direct Medical Spending on Young and Average-Age Onset Colorectal Cancer before and after Diagnosis: a Population-Based Costing Study.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Ria GargFaculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
Vicki ChengFaculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
Ursula EllisUniversity of British Columbia Library, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Vanay VermaFaculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
Helen McTaggart-CowanBC Cancer, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Stuart PeacockBC Cancer, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Jonathan M LoreeBC Cancer, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Mohsen SadatsafaviFaculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
Mary A De VeraFaculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada. mdevera@mail.ubc.ca.

Funding

CIHR PJT-159467
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGiven the rising incidence of young-onset colorectal cancer (yCRC) among individuals younger than 50 years old, understanding the economic burden of yCRC is required to inform the delivery of healthcare services. Therefore, we conducted a systematic review of studies assessing the direct medical costs of yCRC, and where relevant average-age onset CRC (aCRC).

methodsWe searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Web of Science from inception to May 2022 for original, peer-reviewed studies, that reported direct medical costs (e.g., chemotherapy, radiotherapy, outpatient visits, inpatient care, prescription medications) for yCRC and aCRC. We used a modified version of the Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards checklist to appraise the studies. Costs were inflation-adjusted to 2020 US dollars.

resultsWe included 14 studies from 10 countries, including the USA, England, France, Korea, Vietnam, China, Italy, Australia, Canada and Japan. Five studies focused on prevalent disease and reported annualized per-capita cost of prevalent yCRC, ranging from $2,263 to $16,801 and $1,412 to $14,997 among yCRC and aCRC cases, respectively. Nine studies estimated the cost of incident disease. Synthesis of per-capita costs incurred 12 months following colorectal cancer diagnosis ranged from $23,368 to $89,945 for yCRC and $19,929 to $67,195 for aCRC. Five studies used multivariable approaches to compare costs associated with yCRC and aCRC, four showed no differences and one suggested greater costs with yCRC.

conclusionOur synthesis of direct medical costs of yCRC across multiple jurisdictions provide relevant information for healthcare decisions, including on-going considerations for expanding CRC screening strategies to younger adults.

Indexed as

Colorectal NeoplasmsDelivery of Health CareAdultCost-Benefit AnalysisHealth Care CostsHumansIncidenceMass ScreeningMiddle AgedCostsSystematic reviewYoung-onset colorectal cancer

Identifiers

PMID36042470
PMCPMC9426038

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.