Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36042418›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2022

Volumetric macromolecule identification in cryo-electron tomograms using capsule networks.

Noushin Hajarolasvadi, Vikram Sunkara, Sagar Khavnekar, Florian Beck, Robert Brandt, Daniel Baum

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Computational methods forFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Noushin HajarolasvadiDepartment of Visual and Data-Centric Computing, Zuse Institute Berlin, Takustraße 7, 14195, Berlin, Germany. hajarolasvadi@zib.de.
Vikram SunkaraDepartment of Visual and Data-Centric Computing, Zuse Institute Berlin, Takustraße 7, 14195, Berlin, Germany.
Sagar KhavnekarDepartment of CryoEM Technology, Max Planck Institute of Biochemistry, Am Klopferspitz 18, 82152, Martinsried, Germany.
Florian BeckDepartment of CryoEM Technology, Max Planck Institute of Biochemistry, Am Klopferspitz 18, 82152, Martinsried, Germany.
Robert BrandtMaterials and Structural Analysis, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Takustraße 7, 14195, Berlin, Germany.
Daniel BaumDepartment of Visual and Data-Centric Computing, Zuse Institute Berlin, Takustraße 7, 14195, Berlin, Germany.

Funding

Berlin Institute for the Foundations of Learning and Data BIFOLD-BZML 01IS18037HBundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung 3FO18501
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDespite recent advances in cellular cryo-electron tomography (CET), developing automated tools for macromolecule identification in submolecular resolution remains challenging due to the lack of annotated data and high structural complexities. To date, the extent of the deep learning methods constructed for this problem is limited to conventional Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs). Identifying macromolecules of different types and sizes is a tedious and time-consuming task. In this paper, we employ a capsule-based architecture to automate the task of macromolecule identification, that we refer to as 3D-UCaps. In particular, the architecture is composed of three components: feature extractor, capsule encoder, and CNN decoder. The feature extractor converts voxel intensities of input sub-tomograms to activities of local features. The encoder is a 3D Capsule Network (CapsNet) that takes local features to generate a low-dimensional representation of the input. Then, a 3D CNN decoder reconstructs the sub-tomograms from the given representation by upsampling.

resultsWe performed binary and multi-class localization and identification tasks on synthetic and experimental data. We observed that the 3D-UNet and the 3D-UCaps had an [Formula: see text]score mostly above 60% and 70%, respectively, on the test data. In both network architectures, we observed degradation of at least 40% in the [Formula: see text]-score when identifying very small particles (PDB entry 3GL1) compared to a large particle (PDB entry 4D8Q). In the multi-class identification task of experimental data, 3D-UCaps had an [Formula: see text]-score of 91% on the test data in contrast to 64% of the 3D-UNet. The better [Formula: see text]-score of 3D-UCaps compared to 3D-UNet is obtained by a higher precision score. We speculate this to be due to the capsule network employed in the encoder. To study the effect of the CapsNet-based encoder architecture further, we performed an ablation study and perceived that the [Formula: see text]-score is boosted as network depth is increased which is in contrast to the previously reported results for the 3D-UNet. To present a reproducible work, source code, trained models, data as well as visualization results are made publicly available.

conclusionQuantitative and qualitative results show that 3D-UCaps successfully perform various downstream tasks including identification and localization of macromolecules and can at least compete with CNN architectures for this task. Given that the capsule layers extract both the existence probability and the orientation of the molecules, this architecture has the potential to lead to representations of the data that are better interpretable than those of 3D-UNet.

Indexed as

ElectronsNeural Networks, ComputerElectron Microscope TomographyMacromolecular SubstancesProbabilityMacromolecular SubstancesBiomedical imagingCapsule networkCellular cryo-electron tomographyDeep learningMacromolecule identification

Identifiers

PMID36042418
PMCPMC9429335

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.