Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36042410›Full record

Observational studyBMC geriatrics2022

Medication risks in older patients (70 +) with cancer and their association with therapy-related toxicity.

Imke Ortland, Monique Mendel Ott, Michael Kowar, Christoph Sippel, Yon-Dschun Ko, Andreas H Jacobs, Ulrich Jaehde

Open access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMC geriatrics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Feasibility of a comprehensive medication review to improve medication use for patients with cancer and comorbid conditions.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Imke OrtlandInstitute of Pharmacy, Department of Clinical Pharmacy, University of Bonn, An der Immenburg 4, 53121, Bonn, Germany.
Monique Mendel OttInstitute of Pharmacy, Department of Clinical Pharmacy, University of Bonn, An der Immenburg 4, 53121, Bonn, Germany.
Michael KowarDepartment of Geriatrics and Neurology, Johanniter Hospital Bonn, Johanniterstr. 1-3, 53113, Bonn, Germany.
Christoph SippelDepartment of Oncology and Hematology, Johanniter Hospital Bonn, Johanniterstr. 1-3, 53113, Bonn, Germany.
Yon-Dschun Ko *Department of Oncology and Hematology, Johanniter Hospital Bonn, Johanniterstr. 1-3, 53113, Bonn, Germany.
Andreas H Jacobs *Department of Geriatrics and Neurology, Johanniter Hospital Bonn, Johanniterstr. 1-3, 53113, Bonn, Germany.
Ulrich Jaehde *Institute of Pharmacy, Department of Clinical Pharmacy, University of Bonn, An der Immenburg 4, 53121, Bonn, Germany. u.jaehde@uni-bonn.de.
Johanniter-Krankenhaus Bonn · DEUniversity of Bonn · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo evaluate medication-related risks in older patients with cancer and their association with severe toxicity during antineoplastic therapy.

methodsThis is a secondary analysis of two prospective, single-center observational studies which included patients ≥ 70 years with cancer. The patients' medication lists were investigated regarding possible risks: polymedication (defined as the use of ≥ 5 drugs), potentially inappropriate medication (PIM), and relevant potential drug-drug interactions (rPDDI). The risks were analyzed before and after start of cancer therapy. Severe toxicity during antineoplastic therapy was captured from medical records according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE). The association between grade ≥ 3 toxicity and medication risks was evaluated by univariate as well as multivariate regression adjusted by ECOG and age.

resultsThe study cohort comprised 136 patients (50% female, mean age 77 years, 42% hematological malignancies). Before the start of cancer therapy, patients took on average 5 drugs as long-term medication and 52% of patients were exposed to polymedication. More than half of patients used at least one PIM. Approximately one third of patients exhibited rPDDI. The prevalence of medication risks increased after start of cancer therapy. rPDDI were significantly associated with severe overall toxicity (OR, 5.07; p = 0.036; 95% Confidence Interval (CI) 1.11-23.14; toxicity in patients with rPDDI 94.1% (32/34) vs 75.9% (60/79) in patients without rPDDI) and hematological toxicity (OR, 3.95; p = 0.010; 95% CI 1.38-11.29; hematological toxicity in patients with rPDDI 85.3% (29/34) vs 59.5% (47/79) in patients without rPDDI). In the multivariate analysis adjusted by ECOG and age, only the association for rPDDI with hematological toxicity remained statistically significant (OR, 4.51; p = 0.007; 95% CI 1.52-13.38). These findings should be further investigated in larger studies.

conclusionMedication risks are common in older patients with cancer and might be associated with toxicity. This raises the need for tailored interventions to ensure medication safety in this patient cohort.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsNeoplasmsAgedFemaleHumansInappropriate PrescribingMalePolypharmacyPotentially Inappropriate Medication ListProspective StudiesRisk FactorsAntineoplastic AgentsDrug-drug interactionsOlder patients with cancerOnco-geriatricsPolymedicationPotentially inappropriate medicationToxicity

Identifiers

PMID36042410
PMCPMC9429305
OpenAlexW4293685805

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.