Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36042393›Full record

SynthesisJournal of neurodevelopmental disorders2022

Auditory processing in rodent models of autism: a systematic review.

Maya Wilde, Lena Constantin, Peter R Thorne, Johanna M Montgomery, Ethan K Scott, Juliette E Cheyne

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of neurodevelopmental disorders, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. TheFrontiers in behavioral neuroscience · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Maya WildeThe Queensland Brain Institute, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, 4072, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-5762-8427
Lena ConstantinThe Queensland Brain Institute, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, 4072, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-1492-3845
Peter R ThorneDepartment of Physiology, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, Centre for Brain Research, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0003-0214-0210
Johanna M MontgomeryDepartment of Physiology, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, Centre for Brain Research, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0002-8714-7456
Ethan K ScottThe Queensland Brain Institute, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, 4072, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-3150-9216
Juliette E CheyneDepartment of Physiology, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, Centre for Brain Research, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand. j.cheyne@auckland.ac.nz.ORCID 0000-0002-2355-7253
The University of Queensland · AUUniversity of Auckland · NZ

Funding

An integrated platform for studying sensory networks in the vertebrate brainRF1NS118406 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND · PI SCOTT, ETHAN KIME · 2020 to 2020
$1.2M
NINDS NIH HHS RF1 NS118406
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Autism is a complex condition with many traits, including differences in auditory sensitivity. Studies in human autism are plagued by the difficulty of controlling for aetiology, whereas studies in individual rodent models cannot represent the full spectrum of human autism. This systematic review compares results in auditory studies across a wide range of established rodent models of autism to mimic the wide range of aetiologies in the human population. A search was conducted in the PubMed and Web of Science databases to find primary research articles in mouse or rat models of autism which investigate central auditory processing. A total of 88 studies were included. These used non-invasive measures of auditory function, such as auditory brainstem response recordings, cortical event-related potentials, electroencephalography, and behavioural tests, which are translatable to human studies. They also included invasive measures, such as electrophysiology and histology, which shed insight on the origins of the phenotypes found in the non-invasive studies. The most consistent results across these studies were increased latency of the N1 peak of event-related potentials, decreased power and coherence of gamma activity in the auditory cortex, and increased auditory startle responses to high sound levels. Invasive studies indicated loss of subcortical inhibitory neurons, hyperactivity in the lateral superior olive and auditory thalamus, and reduced specificity of responses in the auditory cortex. This review compares the auditory phenotypes across rodent models and highlights those that mimic findings in human studies, providing a framework and avenues for future studies to inform understanding of the auditory system in autism.

Indexed as

Autistic DisorderAnimalsAuditory PerceptionElectroencephalographyEvoked Potentials, Auditory, Brain StemHumansMiceRatsRodentiaAuditoryAuditory brainstem recordingsAutism spectrum disorderCortical event-related potentialsRodent models

Identifiers

PMID36042393
PMCPMC9429780
OpenAlexW4293699053

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.