Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36042332›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

The healthy equine uterus harbors a distinct core microbiome plus a rich and diverse microbiome that varies with geographical location.

G R Holyoak, H U Premathilake, C C Lyman, J L Sones, A Gunn, X Wieneke, U DeSilva

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Reproductive Tract Microbiota of Mares.Veterinary sciences · 2024
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Metagenetic Analysis of the Pregnant Microbiome in Horses.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

G R Holyoak *Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK, USA.
H U Premathilake *Department of Animal and Food Sciences, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK, USA.
C C LymanCollege of Veterinary Medicine, Auburn University, Auburn, AL, USA.
J L SonesSchool of Veterinary Medicine, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA, USA.
A GunnSchool of Agricultural, Environmental and Veterinary Sciences and Gulbali Institute, Charles Sturt University, Wagga Wagga, NSW, Australia.
X WienekeDepartment of Animal and Food Sciences, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK, USA.
U DeSilvaDepartment of Animal and Food Sciences, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK, USA. udaya.desilva@okstate.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The goal of this study was to understand the composition and existence of the resident uterine microbiome in healthy mares and to establish the presence of a core microbiome for the healthy equine uterus. We analyzed the microbiomes of 35 healthy mares that are long-time residents of three farms in Oklahoma, Louisiana, and Australia as well as that of 19 mares purchased from scattered owners in the Southern Mid-Western states of the United States. Over 6 million paired-end reads of the V4 region of the 16S rRNA gene were obtained resulting in 19,542 unique Amplicon Sequence Variants (ASVs). ASVs were assigned to 17 known phyla and 213 known genera. Most abundant genera across all animals were Pseudomonas (27%) followed by Lonsdalea (8%), Lactobacillus (7.5%), Escherichia/Shigella (4.5%), and Prevotella (3%). Oklahoma and Louisiana samples were dominated by Pseudomonas (75%). Lonsdalea (28%) was the most abundant genus in the Australian samples but was not found in any other region. Microbial diversity, richness, and evenness of the equine uterine microbiome is largely dependent on the geographical location of the animal. However, we observed a core uterine microbiome consisting of Lactobacillus, Escherichia/Shigella, Streptococcus, Blautia, Staphylococcus, Klebsiella, Acinetobacter, and Peptoanaerobacter.

Indexed as

MicrobiotaAnimalsAustraliaEscherichiaEubacterialesFemaleHorsesLactobacillusPrevotellaRNA, Ribosomal, 16SUterusRNA, Ribosomal, 16S

Identifiers

PMID36042332
PMCPMC9427864

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.