Nature versus nurture contribution to prostate cancer risk.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Global research landscape and technological breakthroughs in post-prostatectomy urinary incontinence management: a bibliometric review and visualized study.Translational andrology and urology · 2026
   Article
2. Polystyrene microspheres could inhibit the ferroptosis of prostate cancer cells via USP39/IGF2BP3/MAPK4 axis.Journal of translational medicine · 2025
   Article
3. Comparative analysis of ultrasound-guided magnetic resonance imaging-cognitive fusion transrectal versus transperineal prostate biopsy: a 10-year single-center retrospective analysis.Frontiers in medicine · 2025
   Article

Corrections and comments

• Comment on
  A Healthy Lifestyle in Men at Increased Genetic Risk for Prostate Cancer.2023

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Funding

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as