Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36042215›Full record

ArticleNature communications2022

Dynamic mechanisms of CRISPR interference by Escherichia coli CRISPR-Cas3.

Kazuto Yoshimi, Kohei Takeshita, Noriyuki Kodera, Satomi Shibumura, Yuko Yamauchi, Mine Omatsu, Kenichi Umeda, Yayoi Kunihiro, Masaki Yamamoto, Tomoji Mashimo

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Assessing spacer acquisition rates inFrontiers in microbiology · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Kazuto Yoshimi *Division of Animal Genetics, Laboratory Animal Research Center, Institute of Medical Science, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, 108-8639, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-5110-1440
Kohei Takeshita *Life Science Research Infrastructure Group, Advanced Photon Technology Division, RIKEN SPring-8 Center, Hyogo, 679-5148, Japan.
Noriyuki Kodera *Nano Life Science Institute (WPI-NanoLSI), Kanazawa University, Kakuma-machi, Kanazawa, 920-1192, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-4880-8423
Satomi ShibumuraC4U Corporation, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan.
Yuko YamauchiDivision of Animal Genetics, Laboratory Animal Research Center, Institute of Medical Science, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, 108-8639, Japan.
Mine OmatsuLife Science Research Infrastructure Group, Advanced Photon Technology Division, RIKEN SPring-8 Center, Hyogo, 679-5148, Japan.
Kenichi UmedaNano Life Science Institute (WPI-NanoLSI), Kanazawa University, Kakuma-machi, Kanazawa, 920-1192, Japan.
Yayoi KunihiroC4U Corporation, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan.
Masaki YamamotoLife Science Research Infrastructure Group, Advanced Photon Technology Division, RIKEN SPring-8 Center, Hyogo, 679-5148, Japan.
Tomoji MashimoDivision of Animal Genetics, Laboratory Animal Research Center, Institute of Medical Science, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, 108-8639, Japan. mashimo@ims.u-tokyo.ac.jp.ORCID 0000-0001-7543-7301
Tokyo University of Science · JPKanazawa University · JPUniversity of Hyogo · JPSPring-8 · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Type I CRISPR-Cas3 uses an RNA-guided multi Cas-protein complex, Cascade, which detects and degrades foreign nucleic acids via the helicase-nuclease Cas3 protein. Despite many studies using cryoEM and smFRET, the precise mechanism of Cas3-mediated cleavage and degradation of target DNA remains elusive. Here we reconstitute the CRISPR-Cas3 system in vitro to show how the Escherichia coli Cas3 (EcoCas3) with EcoCascade exhibits collateral non-specific single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) cleavage and target specific DNA degradation. Partial binding of EcoCascade to target DNA with tolerated mismatches within the spacer sequence, but not the PAM, elicits collateral ssDNA cleavage activity of recruited EcoCas3. Conversely, stable binding with complete R-loop formation drives EcoCas3 to nick the non-target strand (NTS) in the bound DNA. Helicase-dependent unwinding then combines with trans ssDNA cleavage of the target strand and repetitive cis cleavage of the NTS to degrade the target double-stranded DNA (dsDNA) substrate. High-speed atomic force microscopy demonstrates that EcoCas3 bound to EcoCascade repeatedly reels and releases the target DNA, followed by target fragmentation. Together, these results provide a revised model for collateral ssDNA cleavage and target dsDNA degradation by CRISPR-Cas3, furthering understanding of type I CRISPR priming and interference and informing future genome editing tools.

Indexed as

CRISPR-Associated ProteinsCRISPR-Cas SystemsDNADNA HelicasesDNA, Single-StrandedEscherichia coliEscherichia coli ProteinsCRISPR-Associated ProteinsDNADNA HelicasesDNA, Single-StrandedEscherichia coli ProteinsygcB protein, E coli

Identifiers

PMID36042215
PMCPMC9427990
OpenAlexW4293560936

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.