Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36042158›Full record

SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2022

Antipsychotic polypharmacy reduction versus polypharmacy continuation for people with schizophrenia.

Irene Bighelli, Alessandro Rodolico, Spyridon Siafis, Myrto T Samara, Wulf-Peter Hansen, Salvatore Salomone, Eugenio Aguglia, Pierfelice Cutrufelli, Ingrid Bauer, Lio Baeckers and 1 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Irene Bighelli *Section for Evidence Based Medicine in Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Alessandro Rodolico *Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Psychiatry Unit, University of Catania, Catania, Italy.
Spyridon Siafis *Section for Evidence Based Medicine in Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Myrto T SamaraDepartment of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, University of Thessaly, Larisa, Greece.
Wulf-Peter HansenBASTA - Bündnis für psychisch erkrankte Menschen, Munich, Germany.
Salvatore SalomoneBiomedical and Biotechnological Sciences, University of Catania, Catania, Italy.
Eugenio AgugliaDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Psychiatry Unit, University of Catania, Catania, Italy.
Pierfelice CutrufelliDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Psychiatry Unit, University of Catania, Catania, Italy.
Ingrid BauerSection for Evidence Based Medicine in Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Lio BaeckersSection for Evidence Based Medicine in Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Stefan LeuchtSection for Evidence Based Medicine in Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Technical University of Munich · DEUniversity of Catania · ITUniversity of Thessaly · GR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn clinical practice, different antipsychotics can be combined in the treatment of people with schizophrenia (polypharmacy). This strategy can aim at increasing efficacy, but might also increase the adverse effects due to drug-drug interactions. Reducing polypharmacy by withdrawing one or more antipsychotics may reduce this problem, but must be done carefully, in order to maintain efficacy.

objectivesTo examine the effects and safety of reducing antipsychotic polypharmacy compared to maintaining people with schizophrenia on the same number of antipsychotics. SEARCH

methodsOn 10 February 2021, we searched the Cochrane Schizophrenia Group's Study-Based Register of Trials, which is based on CENTRAL, CINAHL, ClinicalTrials.Gov, Embase, ISRCTN, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, PubMed and WHO ICTRP. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that compared reduction in the number of antipsychotics to continuation of the current number of antipsychotics. We included adults with schizophrenia or related disorders who were receiving more than one antipsychotic and were stabilised on their current treatment. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors independently screened all the identified references for inclusion, and all the full papers. We contacted study authors if we needed any further information. Two review authors independently extracted the data, assessed the risk of bias using RoB 2 and the certainty of the evidence using the GRADE approach. The primary outcomes were: quality of life assessed as number of participants with clinically important change in quality of life; service use assessed as number of participants readmitted to hospital and adverse effects assessed with number of participants leaving the study early due to adverse effects. MAIN

resultsWe included five RCTs with 319 participants. Study duration ranged from three months to one year. All studies compared polypharmacy continuation with two antipsychotics to polypharmacy reduction to one antipsychotic.  We assessed the risk of bias of results as being of some concern or at high risk of bias. A lower number of participants left the study early due to any reason in the polypharmacy continuation group (risk ratio (RR) 0.44, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.29 to 0.68; I AUTHORS'

conclusionsThis review summarises the latest evidence on polypharmacy continuation compared with polypharmacy reduction. Our results show that polypharmacy continuation might be associated with a lower number of participants leaving the study early, especially due to  inefficacy. However, the evidence is of low and very low certainty and the data analyses based on few study only, so that it is not possible to draw strong conclusions based on the results of the present review. Further high-quality RCTs are needed to investigate this important topic.

Indexed as

Antipsychotic AgentsSchizophreniaAdultHumansPolypharmacyWeight GainAntipsychotic Agents

Identifiers

PMID36042158
PMCPMC9427025
OpenAlexW4293702675

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.