Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36042079›Full record

ArticleJournal of general internal medicine2022

Perceived Contraceptive Counseling Quality Among Veterans Using VA Primary Care: Data from the ECUUN Study.

Lisa S Callegari, Siobhan S Mahorter, Sam K Benson, Xinhua Zhao, Eleanor Bimla Schwarz, Sonya Borrero

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of general internal medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Lisa S CallegariHealth Services Research and Development, Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Puget Sound Health Care System, 1660 S. Columbian Way S-152, Seattle, WA, 98108, USA. lisa.callegari@va.gov.ORCID 0000-0003-1303-806X
Siobhan S MahorterHealth Services Research and Development, Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Puget Sound Health Care System, 1660 S. Columbian Way S-152, Seattle, WA, 98108, USA.
Sam K BensonHealth Services Research and Development, Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Puget Sound Health Care System, 1660 S. Columbian Way S-152, Seattle, WA, 98108, USA.
Xinhua ZhaoCenter for Health Equity, Research, and Promotion, VA Pittsburgh Health Care System, Pittsburgh, USA.
Eleanor Bimla SchwarzDepartment of Medicine, University of California, Davis, Sacramento, CA, USA.
Sonya BorreroCenter for Health Equity, Research, and Promotion, VA Pittsburgh Health Care System, Pittsburgh, USA.
Health Services Research & Development · USUniversity of California, Davis · USUniversity of Pittsburgh · USUniversity of Washington · USVA Pittsburgh Healthcare System · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHigh-quality contraceptive counseling is critical to support Veterans' reproductive autonomy and promote healthy outcomes.

objectiveTo describe perceived quality of contraceptive counseling in Veterans Health Administration (VA) primary care and assess factors associated with perceived high- and low-quality contraceptive counseling.

designCross-sectional study using data from the Examining Contraceptive Use and Unmet Need in women Veterans (ECUUN) national telephone survey.

participantsVeterans aged 18-44 who received contraceptive services from a VA primary care clinic in the past year (N=506). MAIN MEASURES: Perceived quality of contraceptive counseling was captured by assessing Veterans' agreement with 6 statements regarding provider counseling adapted from the Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CAHPS) survey. High-quality counseling was defined as a top score of strongly agreeing on all 6 items; low-quality counseling was defined as not agreeing (neutral, disagreeing, or strongly disagreeing) with >3 items. We constructed two multivariable models to assess associations between patient-, provider-, and system-level factors and perceived high-quality (Model 1) and perceived low-quality counseling (Model 2). KEY

resultsMost participants strongly agreed that their providers listened carefully (74%), explained things clearly (77%), and spent enough time discussing things (71%). Lower proportions strongly agreed that their provider discussed more than one option (54%), discussed pros/cons of various methods (44%), or asked which choice they thought was best for them (62%). In Model 1, Veterans who received care in a Women's Health Clinic (WHC) had twice the odds of perceiving high-quality counseling (aOR=1.99; 95%CI=1.24-3.22). In Model 2, Veterans who received care in a WHC (aOR=0.49; 95%CI=0.25-0.97) or from clinicians who provide cervical cancer screening (aOR=0.49; 95%CI=0.26-0.95) had half the odds of perceiving low-quality counseling.

conclusionsOpportunities exist to improve the quality of contraceptive counseling within VA primary care settings, including more consistent efforts to seek patients' perspectives with respect to contraceptive decisions.

Indexed as

Uterine Cervical NeoplasmsVeteransContraceptive AgentsCounselingCross-Sectional StudiesEarly Detection of CancerFemaleHumansPrimary Health CareUnited StatesUnited States Department of Veterans AffairsContraceptive Agentscontraceptive counselingpatient-centered careprimary careprovider-patient communicationwomen Veterans

Identifiers

PMID36042079
PMCPMC9481768
OpenAlexW4293710341

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.