ArticleNeurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology2022
The difference in the diaphragmatic physiological measures between inspiratory and expiratory phases in ALS.
Article in Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- An ultrasound measurement method for assessing diaphragm mobility during maximal respiration.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionWe aimed to clarify the differences in static and dynamic diaphragm parameters between the expiratory and inspiratory phases in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS).
methodsTwenty patients with early-stage ALS and 16 healthy controls were enrolled in the study. We measured the amplitudes of compound muscle action potential (phCMAP) by electrical stimulation of the phrenic nerve and the zone of apposition wall thickness of the diaphragm (DT) using ultrasonography. We analyzed the differences in phCMAP (∆phCMAP) and DT (∆DT) between the end-inspiratory and end-expiratory phases and their correlation with forced vital capacity (FVC).
resultsThe ΔphCMAP (mean 129.7 ± SD 204.7 µV) and ∆DT (0.80 ± 0.88 cm) in patients were significantly smaller than those in controls (348.6 ± 247.7 µV, p = 0.0003 and 1.89 ± 1.10 cm, p = 0.0002, respectively). Although ∆DT was significantly correlated with FVC, we found no correlation between ∆phCMAP and FVC. The phCMAP was paradoxically smaller during inspiration than during expiration in 35% of patients but in none of the controls.
conclusionDynamic parameters of the diaphragm were abnormal in early-stage ALS. The paradoxical reduction in phCMAP during inspiration may reflect early respiratory dysfunction. Assessment of dynamic abnormalities of the diaphragm may provide helpful information for respiratory management in patients with ALS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.