Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36041881›Full record

ReviewCold Spring Harbor perspectives in medicine2023

The Funding Channels of Geroscience.

Stephanie Lederman

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Geroscience and Its Promise.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in medicine · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Stephanie LedermanExecutive Director, American Federation for Aging Research (AFAR), New York, New York 10018, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This review examines the interconnected channels of government, individual, and corporate funding for geroscience. A sometimes-slow flow of federal and philanthropic funding over 50 years is now becoming sufficient to understand how the processes of aging drive disease. The amount has not yet been enough to push the benefits of geroscience into new therapeutics, but that is poised to change. Prominent billionaires, venture capitalists, and new foundations are investing billions in researching approaches for preventing, delaying, or curing the chronic diseases of older people; major pharmaceutical companies are poised to join them once the Food and Drug Administration qualifies aging as a treatable condition. The coming decade could see considerable progress, not only in the science but also in the creation of fresh nonprofit and for-profit funding streams.

Indexed as

AgingGeroscienceAgedHumans

Identifiers

PMID36041881
PMCPMC9808549

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.