Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36041813›Full record

ArticleLupus science & medicine2022

Major infections in newly diagnosed systemic lupus erythematosus: an inception cohort study.

Haiting Wang, Yuhong Zhou, Liqin Yu, Wanlong Wu, Liling Zhao, Shikai Geng, Fangfang Sun, Danting Zhang, Nan Shen, Yi Chen and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Lupus science & medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. [A multicenter study on the tolerance of intravenous low-dose cyclophosphamide in systemic lupus erythematosus].Beijing da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Peking University. Health sciences · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Haiting Wang *Department of Rheumatology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine Affiliated Renji Hospital, Shanghai, Huangpu, China.ORCID 0000-0002-5214-4458
Yuhong Zhou *Department of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine Affiliated Renji Hospital, Shanghai, Huangpu, China.
Liqin YuDepartment of Rheumatology, Suzhou Kowloon Hospital Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Suzhou, Jiangsu, China.
Wanlong WuDepartment of Rheumatology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine Affiliated Renji Hospital, Shanghai, Huangpu, China.
Liling ZhaoDepartment of Rheumatology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine Affiliated Renji Hospital, Shanghai, Huangpu, China.ORCID 0000-0003-0631-9162
Shikai GengDepartment of Rheumatology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine Affiliated Renji Hospital, Shanghai, Huangpu, China.ORCID 0000-0003-2312-0569
Fangfang SunDepartment of Rheumatology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine Affiliated Renji Hospital, Shanghai, Huangpu, China.ORCID 0000-0003-2570-4576
Danting ZhangDepartment of Rheumatology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine Affiliated Renji Hospital, Shanghai, Huangpu, China.ORCID 0000-0001-7205-8795
Nan ShenDepartment of Rheumatology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine Affiliated Renji Hospital, Shanghai, Huangpu, China.
Yi ChenDepartment of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine Affiliated Renji Hospital, Shanghai, Huangpu, China.
Shuang YeDepartment of Rheumatology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine Affiliated Renji Hospital, Shanghai, Huangpu, China ye_shuang2000@163.com.
Shanghai Jiao Tong University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo evaluate the risk of major infections and the relationship between major infections and mortality in patients with newly diagnosed SLE.

methodsA newly diagnosed (<3 months) hospitalised Systemic Lupus Inception Cohort (hSLIC) in our centre during 1 January 2013 and 1 November 2020 was established. All patients were followed up for at least 1 year or until death. Patient baseline characteristics were collected. Major infection events were recorded during follow-up, which were defined as microbiological/clinical-based diagnosis treated with intravenous antimicrobials. The cohort was further divided into a training set and a testing set. Independent predictors of major infections were identified using multivariable logistic regression analysis. Kaplan-Meier survival analyses were conducted.

resultsAmong the 494 patients enrolled in the hSLIC cohort, there were 69 documented episodes of major infections during the first year of follow-up in 67 (14%) patients. The major infection events predominantly occurred within the first 4 months since enrolment (94%, 65/69) and were associated with all-cause mortality. After adjustments for glucocorticoid and immunosuppressant exposure, a prediction model based on SLE Disease Activity Index >10, peripheral lymphocyte count <0.8×10

conclusionsNewly onset active SLE is susceptible to major infections, which is probably due to underlying profound immune disturbance. Identifying high-risk patients using an appropriate prediction tool might lead to better tailored management and better outcome.

Indexed as

Lupus Erythematosus, SystemicCohort StudiesHumansImmunosuppressive AgentsImmunosuppressive Agentsoutcome assessment, health caresystemic lupus erythematosustherapeutics

Identifiers

PMID36041813
PMCPMC9438011
OpenAlexW4293571999

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.