Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36041787›Full record

ReviewCold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology2023

AMPylation and Endoplasmic Reticulum Protein Folding Homeostasis.

Luke A Perera, David Ron

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. The functional dynamics of FicD's TPR domain are modulated by the interaction with ATP and BiP.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. FicD sensitizes cellular response to glucose fluctuations in mouse embryonic fibroblasts.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Luke A PereraCambridge Institute for Medical Research, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 0XY, United Kingdom.
David RonCambridge Institute for Medical Research, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 0XY, United Kingdom dr360@medschl.cam.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-3014-5636
University of Cambridge · GB

Funding

Wellcome Trust 200848/Z/16/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The endoplasmic reticulum (ER)-localized Hsp70 chaperone, BiP, undergoes a rapid, reversible and inactivating post-translational modification. This covalent modification complements the slower, conventional unfolded protein response (UPR) in matching the supply of active Hsp70 chaperone to the protein folding demand within the ER lumen. Long believed to be ADP-ribosylation, we now know this modification to be AMPylation (adenylylation) of BiP's threonine 518. Here, we review the discovery of the responsible enzyme (the Fic domain-containing protein FICD), the structural and biochemical basis of the inactivating modification and the discovery of FICD's dual role as the enzyme that both AMPylates and deAMPylates BiP. The structural basis of BiP recognition by FICD and recent in vitro insights into oligomeric state-mediated regulation of FICD's antagonistic enzymatic activities are also reviewed, the latter in the context of how such a regulatory system may arise in cells. Last, we consider the physiological significance of BiP AMPylation and speculate on the fitness benefits of this metazoan-specific adaptation.

Indexed as

Endoplasmic ReticulumHeat-Shock ProteinsAnimalsEndoplasmic Reticulum Chaperone BiPHomeostasisMolecular ChaperonesProtein FoldingUnfolded Protein ResponseEndoplasmic Reticulum Chaperone BiPHeat-Shock ProteinsMolecular Chaperones

Identifiers

PMID36041787
PMCPMC9979853
OpenAlexW4293579403

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.