Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36041785›Full record

ReviewCold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology2022

Intrinsic Networks Regulating Tissue Repair: Comparative Studies of Oral and Skin Wound Healing.

Andrew M Overmiller, Andrew P Sawaya, Emma D Hope, Maria I Morasso

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Mechanisms and therapeutic potential of therapy-induced cellular senescence in radiotherapy- and chemotherapy-related alimentary tract mucositis.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Elysee Exosome Versus Cellbooster Lift in Oral Wound Healing.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Anti-Inflammatory, Antioxidant, and Reparative Effects ofAntioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Andrew M OvermillerLaboratory of Skin Biology, National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892, USA.
Andrew P SawayaLaboratory of Skin Biology, National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892, USA.
Emma D HopeLaboratory of Skin Biology, National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892, USA.
Maria I MorassoLaboratory of Skin Biology, National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Wound repair is a systematic biological program characterized by four overlapping phases: hemostasis, inflammation, proliferation, and remodeling. Notwithstanding differences between species and distinct anatomical sites, the fundamental phases in the wound healing process are conserved among mammalian species. Oral wound healing is defined as an ideal wound healing model because it resolves rapidly and without scar formation. Understanding the regulation and contribution of the different molecular events that drive rapid wound healing in oral mucosa compared with those of the skin will help us define how these lesions heal more efficiently and may provide new therapeutic strategies that can be translated to the clinical settings for patients with chronic nonhealing wounds. Although all epithelial tissues have remarkable ability for tissue repair, the efficiency of such repair differs between epithelia (oral mucosa vs. cutaneous). This prompts the long-standing, fundamental biological and clinically relevant questions as to why and how does the oral mucosa achieve its enhanced wound healing capacity. In this review, we focus on (1) distinct innate wound healing capabilities of the oral mucosa, (2) lessons learned from comparative transcriptomic studies of oral mucosa versus skin, and (3) translation of findings to therapeutics for enhanced wound healing.

Indexed as

SkinWound HealingAnimalsHumansInflammationMammalsMouth Mucosa

Identifiers

PMID36041785
PMCPMC9620853

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.