Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36041784›Full record

ReviewCold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology2022

Role of Macrophages in Wound Healing.

Sebastian Willenborg, Louise Injarabian, Sabine A Eming

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 57 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
57citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

57 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Marine-Derived Polyketides fromACS pharmacology & translational science · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Targeting myeloid cell-mediated fibrosis through FAK.Nature biomedical engineering · 2026
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Macrophages on demand: How tissue trauma shapes their role.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2026
    Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Sebastian Willenborg *Department of Dermatology, University of Cologne, 50937 Cologne, Germany.
Louise Injarabian *Department of Dermatology, University of Cologne, 50937 Cologne, Germany.
Sabine A Eming *Department of Dermatology, University of Cologne, 50937 Cologne, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Monocytes/macrophages are key components of the body's innate ability to restore tissue function after injury. In most tissues, both embryo-derived tissue-resident macrophages and recruited blood monocyte-derived macrophages contribute to the injury response. The developmental origin of injury-associated macrophages has a major impact on the outcome of the healing process. Macrophages are abundant at all stages of repair and coordinate the progression through the different phases of healing. They are highly plastic cells that continuously adapt to their environment and acquire phase-specific activation phenotypes. Advanced omics methodologies have revealed a vast heterogeneity of macrophage activation phenotypes and metabolic status at injury sites in different organs. In this review, we highlight the role of the developmental origin, the link between the wound phase-specific activation state and metabolic reprogramming as well as the fate of macrophages during the resolution of the wounding response.

Indexed as

Macrophage ActivationMacrophagesWound Healing

Identifiers

PMID36041784
PMCPMC9732901

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.