Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36041773›Full record

Trial reportBMJ open respiratory research2022

Withdrawal of inhaled corticosteroids from patients with COPD with mild or moderate airflow limitation in primary care: a feasibility randomised trial.

Timothy H Harries, Gill Gilworth, Christopher J Corrigan, Patrick Murphy, Nicholas Hart, Mike Thomas, Patrick T White

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMJ open respiratory research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Timothy H HarriesSchool of Population Health and Environmental Sciences, King's College London, London, UK timothy.harries@kcl.ac.uk.
Gill GilworthSchool of Population Health and Environmental Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.
Christopher J CorriganDepartment of Asthma Allergy and Respiratory Science, King's College London, London, UK.
Patrick MurphyLane Fox Respiratory Unit, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Nicholas HartLane Fox Respiratory Unit, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Mike ThomasPCPS, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Patrick T WhiteSchool of Population Health and Environmental Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.
King's College London · GBGuy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity of Southampton · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInhaled corticosteroids (ICS) are frequently prescribed outside guidelines to patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) with mild/moderate airflow limitation and low exacerbation risk. This primary care trial explored the feasibility of identifying patients with mild/moderate COPD taking ICS, and the acceptability of ICS withdrawal.

methodsOpen feasibility trial. Outcome measures included prevalence of suitable participants, feasibility of their identification, their willingness-to-accept open randomisation to ICS withdrawal or continuation over 6 months follow-up.

results392 (13%) of 2967 patients with COPD from 20 practices (209 618 population) identified as eligible for ICS withdrawal by electronic search algorithm. After individual patient record review, 243 (62%) were excluded because of: severe airflow limitation (65, 17%); one or more severe or two or more moderate COPD exacerbations in the previous year (86, 22%); asthma (15, 4%); and severe comorbidities (77, 20%). After exclusion, 149 patients with COPD were invited to participate and 61 agreed to randomisation. At clinical assessment, 10 patients exhibited undocumented airflow reversibility (forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV

conclusionsIdentifying primary care patients with mild/moderate COPD suitable for ICS withdrawal is feasible but requires real-time verification because of unreliable recording of exacerbations and lung function. Suitable patients accepted randomisation to ICS withdrawal or continuation for the purposes of future studies. Follow-up compliance was high. Nearly 50% of participants with a diagnosis of mild/moderate COPD demonstrated previously undocumented FEV

Indexed as

AsthmaPulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveAdministration, InhalationAdrenal Cortex HormonesFeasibility StudiesHumansLungPrimary Health CareQuality of LifeAdrenal Cortex HormonesCOPD epidemiologyCOPD Pharmacology

Identifiers

PMID36041773
PMCPMC9438092
OpenAlexW4293572130

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.