Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36041758›Full record

Trial reportBMJ open2022

Describing, predicting and explaining adherence to total skin self-examination (TSSE) in people with melanoma: a 12-month longitudinal study.

Julia L Allan, Derek W Johnston, Marie Johnston, Peter Murchie

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readObservational StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMJ open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03328247 (Achieving Self-directed Integrated Cancer Aftercare), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03328247 nacompletednot on this map

Achieving Self-directed Integrated Cancer Aftercare (ASICA) in Melanoma: A Randomized Patient-focused Trial of Delivering the ASICA Intervention as a Means to Earlier Detection of Recurrent and Second Primary Melanoma

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of AberdeenRan2018 to 2020Enrolled240ConditionsMelanomaArmsASICA digital app
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Co-Design of the Structured Personalised Assessment for Reviews After Cancer (SPARC) Intervention.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Julia L AllanAberdeen Health Psychology Group, Institute of Applied Health Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK j.allan@abdn.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0001-7287-8363
Derek W JohnstonAberdeen Health Psychology Group, School of Psychology, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK.
Marie JohnstonAberdeen Health Psychology Group, Institute of Applied Health Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK.
Peter MurchieCentre for Academic Primary Care, Insitute of Applied Health Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9968-5991
University of Aberdeen · GB

Funding

Cancer Research UK 21685
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo describe trajectories in melanoma survivors' adherence to monthly total skin self-examination (TSSE) over 12 months, and to investigate whether adherence trajectories can be predicted from demographic, cognitive or emotional factors at baseline.

designA longitudinal observational study nested within the intervention arm of the ASICA (Achieving Self-Directed Integrated Cancer Aftercare) randomised controlled trial.

settingFollow-up secondary care in Aberdeen and Cambridge UK.

participantsn=104 adults (48 men/56 women; mean age 58.83 years, SD 13.47, range 28-85 years; mean Scottish Index of Multiple Deprivation score 8.03, SD 1.73, range 2-10) who had been treated for stage 0-IIC primary cutaneous melanoma in the preceding 60 months and were actively participating in the intervention arm of the ASICA trial.

interventionsAll participants were using the ASICA intervention-a tablet-based intervention designed to support monthly TSSE. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was adherence to guideline recommended (monthly) TSSE over 12 months. This was determined from time-stamped TSSE data recorded by the ASICA intervention app.

resultsLatent growth mixture models identified three TSSE adherence trajectories (adherent -41%; drop-off -35%; non-adherent -24%). People who were non-adherent were less likely to intend to perform TSSE as recommended, intending to do it more frequently (OR=0.21, 95% CI 0.06 to 0.81, p=0.023) and were more depressed (OR=1.31, 95% CI 1.06 to 1.61, p=0.011) than people who were adherent. People whose adherence dropped off over time had less well-developed action plans (OR=0.78, 95% CI 0.63 to 0.96, p=0.016) and lower self-efficacy about TSSE (OR=0.92, 95% CI 0.86 to 0.99, p=0.028) than people who were adherent.

conclusionsAdherence to monthly TSSE in people treated for melanoma can be differentiated into adherent, drop-off and non-adherent trajectories. Collecting information about intentions to engage in TSSE, depression, self-efficacy and/or action planning at outset may help to identify those who would benefit from additional intervention. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ClinicalTrials.gov Registry (NCT03328247).

Indexed as

MelanomaSkin NeoplasmsAdultChildChild, PreschoolCutaneous Malignant MelanomaFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleSelf-Examinationadult oncologydermatological tumourspreventive medicine

Identifiers

PMID36041758
PMCPMC9438032
OpenAlexW4293572129

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.