ArticleNeuroImage2022
Mixtures of large-scale dynamic functional brain network modes.
Article in NeuroImage, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
25 citing papers in PubMed, 48 citations in OpenAlex.
- Age-Related Changes in Spontaneous Brain Dynamics Revealed by Resting-State Magnetoencephalography.GeroScience · 2026Article
- Temporal neural dynamics patterns in episodic and chronic migraine: a magnetoencephalography study.The journal of headache and pain · 2026Article
- Individual cases of Parkinson's disease can be robustly classified using magnetoencephalography.NPJ Parkinson's disease · 2026Article
- Effects of Age on Resting-State Cortical Networks.Human brain mapping · 2026Article
- Temporally Defined Brain Network Activation Associated With Slowed Information Processing Speed in Multiple Sclerosis.Human brain mapping · 2026Article
- Divergence of cortical neurophysiology across different neurodegenerative disorders compared to healthy ageing.Progress in neurobiology · 2026Article
- Static and dynamic intracerebral signal analysis reveals protective networks against seizures in drug-resistant focal epilepsy.Brain communications · 2026Article
- MEG state dynamics of sentence generation: evidence for a compensatory segmentation mechanism in healthy aging.Frontiers in computational neuroscience · 2026Article
- Large-scale cortical functional networks are organized in structured cycles.Nature neuroscience · 2025Article
- Divergent Brain Network Activity in Asymptomatic C9orf72 and SOD1 Variant Carriers Compared With Established Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis.Human brain mapping · 2025Article
- Magnetoencephalography Dimensionality Reduction Informed by Dynamic Brain States.The European journal of neuroscience · 2025Article
- Evidence for Transient, Uncoupled Power and Functional Connectivity Dynamics.Human brain mapping · 2025Article
- Predicting individual traits from models of brain dynamics accurately and reliably using the Fisher kernel.eLife · 2025Article
- Mapping multi-modal dynamic network activity during naturalistic music listening.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2025Article
- Comparison between EEG and MEG of static and dynamic resting-state networks.Human brain mapping · 2024Article
- Article
- Post-stroke upper limb recovery is correlated with dynamic resting-state network connectivity.Brain communications · 2024Article
- The GLM-spectrum: A multilevel framework for spectrum analysis with covariate and confound modelling.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2024Article
- Transformer-aided dynamic causal model for scalable estimation of effective connectivity.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2024Article
- Dynamic network analysis of electrophysiological task data.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Accurate temporal modelling of functional brain networks is essential in the quest for understanding how such networks facilitate cognition. Researchers are beginning to adopt time-varying analyses for electrophysiological data that capture highly dynamic processes on the order of milliseconds. Typically, these approaches, such as clustering of functional connectivity profiles and Hidden Markov Modelling (HMM), assume mutual exclusivity of networks over time. Whilst a powerful constraint, this assumption may be compromising the ability of these approaches to describe the data effectively. Here, we propose a new generative model for functional connectivity as a time-varying linear mixture of spatially distributed statistical "modes". The temporal evolution of this mixture is governed by a recurrent neural network, which enables the model to generate data with a rich temporal structure. We use a Bayesian framework known as amortised variational inference to learn model parameters from observed data. We call the approach DyNeMo (for Dynamic Network Modes), and show using simulations it outperforms the HMM when the assumption of mutual exclusivity is violated. In resting-state MEG, DyNeMo reveals a mixture of modes that activate on fast time scales of 100-150 ms, which is similar to state lifetimes found using an HMM. In task MEG data, DyNeMo finds modes with plausible, task-dependent evoked responses without any knowledge of the task timings. Overall, DyNeMo provides decompositions that are an approximate remapping of the HMM's while showing improvements in overall explanatory power. However, the magnitude of the improvements suggests that the HMM's assumption of mutual exclusivity can be reasonable in practice. Nonetheless, DyNeMo provides a flexible framework for implementing and assessing future modelling developments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.