ArticleJournal of immunological methods2022
Stabilization of leukocytes from cerebrospinal fluid for central immunophenotypic evaluation in multicenter clinical trials.
Article in Journal of immunological methods, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- CSF Leukocytes in Intracranial Infections: Diagnostic, Mechanistic, and Therapeutic Insights for Neurocritical Care.Cellular and molecular neurobiology · 2026Review
- Discrepancy between central nervous system involvement at diagnosis and relapse burden in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia: a five-year cohort study in a middle-income setting.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Paediatric cerebrospinal fluid immune profiling distinguishes paediatric-onset multiple sclerosis from other paediatric-onset acute neurological disorders.EBioMedicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
9 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Analysis of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) represents a valuable window into the pathogenesis of neuroinflammatory diseases, such as multiple sclerosis (MS). However, analysis of the cellular fraction of CSF is often neglected because CSF cells die rapidly ex vivo. Immunophenotyping of CSF cells in multicenter clinical trials requires sample preservation and shipping to a centralized lab. Yet, there is no consensus on the best method to preserve intact CSF cells and no detailed evaluation of subset-specific cell loss. We used flow cytometry to compare major leukocyte populations in fresh CSF (processed within 2 h) to cells fixed for 48 h with TransFix-EDTA® or cryopreserved and thawed after 96 h. We observed a statistically significant loss of total mononuclear cells, total T cells, CD3+ CD8- T cells, and CD3+ CD8+ T cells after cryopreservation compared to fresh or fixed (p < 0.001), with no significant difference between fresh and fixed. Thus, our results demonstrate that TransFix-EDTA® was superior to cryopreservation for preserving intact CSF T cells. Surprisingly, neither cryopreservation nor fixation had a significant effect on recovery of low frequency cell subsets in CSF, including B cells, NK cells, NKT-like cells, CD14+ monocytes, or CD123+ DCs, versus fresh CSF. To determine the effect of prolonged fixation on cell recovery, we analyzed major CSF cell subsets by flow cytometry after 24, 48, or 72 h of fixation with TransFix-EDTA®. We observed a consistent and progressive loss in the absolute counts of all subsets over time, although this effect was not statistically significant. We conclude that for immunophenotyping of major CSF cell subsets by flow cytometry, fixation with TransFix-EDTA®, shipment to a central lab, and analysis within 48 h is a feasible method to ensure stability of both absolute cell number and relative frequency. This method is a valuable alternative to fresh CSF analysis and can be implemented in multicenter clinical trials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.