Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36040972›Full record

ArticlePloS one2022

Detailed measurements and simulations of electric field distribution of two TMS coils cleared for obsessive compulsive disorder in the brain and in specific regions associated with OCD.

Marietta Tzirini, Yiftach Roth, Tal Harmelech, Samuel Zibman, Gaby S Pell, Vasilios K Kimiskidis, Aron Tendler, Abraham Zangen, Theodoros Samaras

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06490965 (Improving Obsessive-compulsive Disorder Treatments), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06490965 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Improving Obsessive-compulsive Disorder Treatments: from Lesions to Neuromodulation Targets

TypeinterventionalSponsorFundacao ChampalimaudRan2024 to 2026Enrolled32ConditionsObsessive-Compulsive DisorderArmsRepetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation, Neuronavigation, Magnetic Resonance Imaging
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 4 countries.

Marietta TziriniSchool of Physics, Faculty of Sciences, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece.ORCID 0000-0001-8412-880X
Yiftach RothDepartment of Life Sciences, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva, Israel.
Tal HarmelechBrainsWay Ltd., Jerusalem, Israel.
Samuel ZibmanBrainsWay Ltd., Jerusalem, Israel.
Gaby S PellDepartment of Life Sciences, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva, Israel.
Vasilios K Kimiskidis1st Department of Neurology, Medical School, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece.
Aron TendlerDepartment of Life Sciences, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva, Israel.ORCID 0000-0001-8587-7335
Abraham ZangenDepartment of Life Sciences, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva, Israel.
Theodoros SamarasSchool of Physics, Faculty of Sciences, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece.ORCID 0000-0003-0170-4520
Ben-Gurion University of the Negev · ILAristotle University of Thessaloniki · GRUniversity of Malta · MT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The FDA cleared deep transcranial magnetic stimulation (Deep TMS) with the H7 coil for obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) treatment, following a double-blinded placebo-controlled multicenter trial. Two years later the FDA cleared TMS with the D-B80 coil on the basis of substantial equivalence. In order to investigate the induced electric field characteristics of the two coils, these were placed at the treatment position for OCD over the prefrontal cortex of a head phantom, and the field distribution was measured. Additionally, numerical simulations were performed in eight Population Head Model repository models with two sets of conductivity values and three Virtual Population anatomical head models and their homogeneous versions. The H7 was found to induce significantly higher maximal electric fields (p<0.0001, t = 11.08) and to stimulate two to five times larger volumes in the brain (p<0.0001, t = 6.71). The rate of decay of electric field with distance is significantly slower for the H7 coil (p < 0.0001, Wilcoxon matched-pairs test). The field at the scalp is 306% of the field at a 3 cm depth with the D-B80, and 155% with the H7 coil. The H7 induces significantly higher intensities in broader volumes within the brain and in specific brain regions known to be implicated in OCD (dorsal anterior cingulate cortex (dACC), dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (dlPFC), inferior frontal gyrus (IFG), orbitofrontal cortex (OFC) and pre-supplementary motor area (pre-SMA)) compared to the D-B80. Significant field ≥ 80 V/m is induced by the H7 (D-B80) in 15% (1%) of the dACC, 78% (29%) of the pre-SMA, 50% (20%) of the dlPFC, 30% (12%) of the OFC and 15% (1%) of the IFG. Considering the substantial differences between the two coils, the clinical efficacy in OCD should be tested and verified separately for each coil.

Indexed as

Motor CortexObsessive-Compulsive DisorderBrainHeadHumansTranscranial Magnetic Stimulation

Identifiers

PMID36040972
PMCPMC9426893
OpenAlexW4293679209

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.