Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36040928›Full record

ArticlePLoS neglected tropical diseases2022

Diagnostics to support the control of scabies-Development of two target product profiles.

Michael Marks, Jodie McVernon, James S McCarthy, Wendemagegn Enbiale, Christopher Hanna, Olivier Chosidow, Daniel Engelman, Kingsley Asiedu, Andrew Steer

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Scabies.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2024
    Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 7 institutions in 6 countries.

Michael MarksDepartment of Clinical Research, Faculty of Infectious and Tropical Diseases, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-7585-4743
Jodie McVernonDepartment of Infectious Diseases, The University of Melbourne at the Peter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity, Melbourne, Australia.
James S McCarthyDepartment of Infectious Diseases, The University of Melbourne at the Peter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity, Melbourne, Australia.
Wendemagegn EnbialeBahir Dar University, college of Medicine and Health sciences, Dermatovenerology Department, Bahir Dar, Ethiopia.
Christopher HannaGlobal Project Partners, Oakland, California, United States of America.
Olivier ChosidowAP-HP, Hôpitaux universitaires Henri Mondor, Service de Dermatologie, Créteil, France.
Daniel EngelmanTropical Diseases, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia.
Kingsley AsieduDepartment for the Control of Neglected Tropical Diseases, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
Andrew SteerTropical Diseases, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia.
Royal Children's Hospital · AUAmsterdam University Medical Centers · NLÉcole Nationale Vétérinaire d'Alfort · FRRoyal London Hospital · GBThe Royal Melbourne Hospital · AUThe University of Melbourne · AUWorld Health Organization · CH

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundScabies was added to the WHO NTD portfolio in 2017 and targets for the control of scabies were included in the 2021-2030 WHO NTD roadmap. A major component of scabies control efforts a strategy based on mass drug administration (MDA) with ivermectin. Currently diagnosis of scabies relies on clinical examination with a limited role for diagnostic testing. Under the recommendation of the WHO Diagnostic Technical Advisory Group (DTAG) for Neglected Tropical Diseases, a working group was assembled and tasked with agreeing on priority use cases for and developing target product profiles (TPPs) for new diagnostics tools for scabies. METHODOLOGY AND PRINCIPAL

findingsThe working group convened three times and established two use cases: establishing if the 10% threshold for mass drug administration had been reached and if the 2% threshold for stopping mass drug administration has been achieved. One subgroup assessed the current diagnostic landscape for scabies and a second subgroup determined the test requirements for both use cases. Draft TPPs were sent out for input from stakeholders and experts. Both TPPs considered the following parameters: product use, design, performance, configuration, cost, access and equity. The group considered the use of the tests as a single step process or as part of a two step process following initial clinical examination. When used a single step test (the ideal scenario) for starting MDA a new diagnostic required a sensitivity of ≥92% and a specificity of ≥98%. When used a single step test (the ideal scenario) for stopping MDA a new diagnostic required a sensitivity of ≥80% and a specificity of ≥99%.

conclusionsThe TPPs developed will provide test developers with guidance to ensure that novel diagnostic tests meet identified public health needs.

Indexed as

ScabiesHumansIvermectinMass Drug AdministrationNeglected DiseasesIvermectin

Identifiers

PMID36040928
PMCPMC9467343
OpenAlexW4293680260

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.