Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36040909›Full record

Observational studyJournal of global health2022

Long-term survival benefit of male and multimorbid COVID-19 patients with 5-day remdesivir treatment.

Lorinc Polivka, Jozsef Gajdacsi, Levente Fazekas, Szilvia Sebok, Eniko Barczi, Edit Hidvegi, Zoltan Sutto, Elek Dinya, Pal Maurovich-Horvat, Attila J Szabo and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Journal of global health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Different COVID-19 treatments' impact on hospital length of stay.European journal of medical research · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Lorinc Polivka *Department of Pulmonology, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.
Jozsef Gajdacsi *Clinical Center, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.
Levente FazekasHeart and Vascular Center, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.
Szilvia SebokUniversity Pharmacy Department of Pharmacy Administration, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.
Eniko BarcziDepartment of Pulmonology, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.
Edit HidvegiDepartment of Pulmonology, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.
Zoltan SuttoDepartment of Pulmonology, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.
Elek DinyaInstitute of Digital Health Sciences, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.
Pal Maurovich-HorvatMedical Imaging Centre, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.
Attila J SzaboClinical Center, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.
Bela Merkely *Heart and Vascular Center, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.
Veronika Müller *Department of Pulmonology, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.
Semmelweis University · HU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Treatment of the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) is still challenging due to the lack of evidence-based treatment protocols and continuously changing epidemiological situations and vaccinations. Remdesivir (RDV) is among the few antiviral medications with confirmed efficacy for specific patient groups. However, real-world data on long-term outcomes for a short treatment course are scarce. Methods: This retrospective observational cohort study included real-life data collected during the second and third wave of the COVID-19 pandemic in Hungary (September 1, 2020-April 30, 2021) from inpatients at a University Center (n = 947). Participants consisted of two propensity score-matched cohorts (370/370 cases): Group RDV including patients receiving RDV and supplementary oxygen and Group standard of care (SOC) as control. The primary outcome was the effect of 5-day RDV treatment on 30- and 60-day all-cause mortality. Multivariate analyses were performed to assess the effect of RDV by different covariates. Results: Group RDV included significantly more patients from the alpha variant wave, with greater frequency of comorbidities diabetes and anemia, and larger degree of parenchymal involvement. All-cause mortality at 30- and 60-day were significantly lower in Group RDV compared to Group SOC. Significant risk reduction of 60-day all-cause mortality was observed for RDV treatment in men and patients with COPD or multiple comorbidities. Conclusions: Hospitalized COVID-19 patients with 5-day RDV treatment had significantly lower 30- and 60-day all-cause mortality, despite their more severe clinical condition. Men and patients with multiple comorbidities, including COPD, profited the most from RDV treatment in the long term. Due to the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic, effective treatment regimens are needed for hospitalized patients.

Indexed as

CoronavirusCoronavirus InfectionsCOVID-19 Drug TreatmentPulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveAdenosine MonophosphateAlanineBetacoronavirusHumansMalePandemicsRetrospective StudiesSARS-CoV-2Adenosine MonophosphateAlanineremdesivir

Identifiers

PMID36040909
PMCPMC9428504
OpenAlexW4293578890

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.