Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36040740›Full record

Trial reportJAMA network open2022

An Evidence-Based Educational Intervention for Reducing Coercive Measures in Psychiatric Hospitals: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Maritta Välimäki, Tella Lantta, Minna Anttila, Tero Vahlberg, Sharon-Lise Normand, Min Yang

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled TrialPragmatic Clinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in JAMA network open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02724748 (The Effectiveness of User-driven Intervention to Manage Patient Aggression in Mental Health Services), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02724748 nacompletednot on this map

The Effectiveness of User-driven Intervention to Manage Patient Aggression in Mental Health Services

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of TurkuRan2016 to 2018Enrolled28ConditionsAggression, Mental DisordersArmsEducational intervention
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 5 countries.

Maritta VälimäkiDepartment of Nursing Science, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.
Tella LanttaDepartment of Nursing Science, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.
Minna AnttilaDepartment of Nursing Science, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.
Tero VahlbergDepartment of Biostatistics, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.
Sharon-Lise NormandDepartment of Health Care Policy, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Min YangWest China School of Public Health, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
University of Turku · FICentral South University · CNHarvard University · USManchester Metropolitan University · GBSichuan University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Investing in health care staffs' education can change the scope of action and improve care. The effectiveness of staff education remains inconclusive. Objective: To examine whether an evidence-based educational intervention for nurses decreases the use of seclusion rooms in psychiatric hospitals compared with usual practice. Design, Setting, and Participants: In this pragmatic, 2-arm parallel, stratified cluster randomized clinical trial, 28 wards in 15 psychiatric hospitals in Finland were screened for eligibility and randomly allocated (1:1). Nurses joined on either intervention (n = 13) or usual practice (n = 15) wards. The intervention was performed from May 1, 2016, to October 31, 2017. The follow-up data for January 1 to December 31, 2017, were collected from hospital registers in 2018. Data analysis was performed October 27, 2021. Interventions: Evidence-based education delivered during 18 months, including 8 months of active education, followed by a 10-month maintenance period. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was the occurrence of patient seclusion (events per total number of patients). Results: Of 28 psychiatric hospital wards screened (437 beds and 648 nurses), 27 wards completed the study. A total of 8349 patients were receiving care in the study wards, with 53% male patients and a mean (SD) age of 40.6 (5.7) years. The overall number of seclusions was 1209 (14.5%) in 2015 and 1349 (16.5%) in 2017. In the intervention group, the occurrence rate of seclusion at the ward level decreased by 5.3% from 629 seclusions among 4163 patients (15.1%) to 585 seclusions among 4089 patients (14.3%) compared with a 34.7% increase from 580 seclusions among 4186 patients (13.9%) to 764 seclusions among 4092 patients (18.7%) in the usual practice group. The adjusted rate ratio was 0.86 (95% CI, 0.40-1.82) in 2015 and 0.66 (95% CI, 0.31-1.41) in 2017 (P = .003). However, the number of forced injections increased in the intervention group from 317 events among 4163 patients (7.6%) in 2015 to 486 events among 4089 patients (11.9%) in 2017 compared with an increase in the usual practice group from 414 events among 4186 patients (9.9%) in 2015 to 481 events among 4092 patients (11.8%) in 2017. Seven adverse events were reported. Conclusions and Relevance: In this randomized clinical trial, the educational intervention had a limited effect on the change of occurrence rate of patient seclusion, whereas the use of forced injections increased. More studies are needed to better understand the reasons for these findings. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02724748.

Indexed as

CoercionHospitals, PsychiatricAdultFemaleFinlandHumansMale

Identifiers

PMID36040740
PMCPMC9428738
OpenAlexW4293572161

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.