ArticleJAMA network open2022
Association of Rurality, Race and Ethnicity, and Socioeconomic Status With the Surgical Management of Colon Cancer and Postoperative Outcomes Among Medicare Beneficiaries.
Article in JAMA network open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
32 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.
- Factors Associated with Severe Postoperative Complications (Clavien-Dindo Grades III-IV) After Left-Sided Colon Cancer Surgery: A Single-Centre Retrospective Cohort Study.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Social disruption after cancer: longitudinal changes in marital status, residence, and income among over 450,000 cancer patients.Cancer causes & control : CCC · 2026Article
- Survivability in patients with rare sigmoid colon adenocarcinoma variants: exploring the influence of rural-urban continuum codes and social determinants of health in the USA.Cancer causes & control : CCC · 2026Article
- Disparities Across Race, Ethnicity, and Rurality Among Surgical Patients.Annals of surgery open : perspectives of surgical history, education, and clinical approaches · 2026Article
- Disparities in access to and outcomes of minimally invasive surgery: a scoping review.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Article
- Review
- β-Lactam vs Non-β-Lactam Prophylaxis in Elective Colorectal Surgery.JAMA network open · 2026Observational
- Orthopedic Trauma Management: A Comprehensive Review of Surgical Interventions, Rehabilitation, and Patient Outcomes.Cureus · 2026Review
- The Impact of Social Determinants of Health on Severe Colorectal Complications.Clinics in colon and rectal surgery · 2026Review
- Rurality and Use of Metastasis-Directed Therapies for Medicare Beneficiaries with Metastatic Colon Cancer: A Retrospective Cohort Study.Annals of surgical oncology · 2026Article
- Association of rurality status with all-cause and cancer-specific survival: a systematic review and meta-analysis adjusting for clinical factors, demographics, and geographical remoteness.The Lancet regional health. Western Pacific · 2026Review
- Article
- Subspecialization of Surgical Specialties in the US.JAMA health forum · 2025Article
- Global Utilization of Minimally Invasive Surgery: Practice and Challenges.The Journal of surgical research · 2025Article
- Influence of Medicaid Expansion on Rural Medicare Beneficiaries Undergoing Colon Cancer-Directed Surgery in the United States.Annals of surgical oncology · 2025Article
- Health Equity and Emergency Colorectal Surgery in the United States: A Scoping Review.The Journal of surgical research · 2025Article
- Travel burden and bypassing closest site for surgical cancer treatment for urban and rural oncology patients.The Journal of rural health : official journal of the American Rural Health Association and the National Rural Health Care Association · 2025Article
- Overcoming Geographic Barriers: Surgical Care in Rural Populations.Clinics in colon and rectal surgery · 2025Review
- Exploring rural-urban differences in the receipt of nonelective cancer-specific gastrointestinal surgery using a multilevel mixed-effects approach.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2025Article
- Leveraging public health cancer surveillance capacity to develop and support a rural cancer network.Learning health systems · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Importance: Rural patients with colon cancer experience worse outcomes than urban patients, but the extent to which disparities are explained by social determinants is not known. Objectives: To evaluate the association of rurality with surgical treatment and outcomes of colon cancer and to investigate the intersection of rurality with race and ethnicity and socioeconomic status. Design, Settings, and Participants: This cohort study included fee-for-service Medicare beneficiaries 65 years or older diagnosed with incident, nonmetastatic colon cancer between April 1, 2016, and September 30, 2018, with follow-up until December 31, 2018. Data were analyzed from August 3, 2020, to April 30, 2021. Exposures: Rurality of patient's residence, categorized as metropolitan, micropolitan, or small town or rural, using Rural-Urban Commuting Area codes. Main Outcomes and Measures: Receipt of surgery, emergent surgery, or minimally invasive surgery (MIS); 90-day surgical complications; and 90-day mortality. Results: Among 57 710 Medicare beneficiaries with incident, nonmetastatic colon cancer, 46.6% were men, 53.4% were women, and the mean (SD) age was 76.6 (7.2) years. In terms of race and ethnicity, 3.7% were Hispanic, 6.4% were non-Hispanic Black (hereinafter Black), 86.1% were non-Hispanic White (hereinafter White), and 3.8% were American Indian or Alaska Native, Asian or Pacific Islander, or unknown race or ethnicity. Patients residing in nonmetropolitan areas were more likely to undergo surgical resection than those residing in metropolitan areas (69.2% vs 63.9%; P < .001). Black race was independently associated with lower hazard of surgical resection (hazard ratio, 0.92 [95% CI, 0.88-0.95]). Race and ethnicity and measures of socioeconomic status did not modify the association of rurality with surgery. Beneficiaries from small town and rural areas had higher odds of undergoing emergent surgery (adjusted odds ratio [OR], 1.32 [95% CI, 1.20-1.44]) but lower odds of undergoing MIS (adjusted OR, 0.75 [95% CI, 0.70-0.80]), with similar findings for patients residing in micropolitan areas. Members of racial and ethnic minority groups who resided in small town and rural settings experienced higher odds of postoperative surgical complications (P = .001 for interaction) and mortality (P = .001 for interaction). Notably, White patients who resided in small town and rural areas experienced lower odds of postoperative mortality than their White metropolitan counterparts (adjusted OR, 0.81 [95% CI, 0.71-0.92]), but Black patients who resided in small town and rural areas had significantly higher odds of postoperative mortality (adjusted OR, 1.86 [95% CI, 1.16-2.97]) than their Black metropolitan counterparts. Conclusions and Relevance: These findings suggest that Medicare beneficiaries from small town and rural areas were more likely to undergo surgery for nonmetastatic colon cancer than metropolitan beneficiaries but also more likely to undergo emergent surgery and less likely to have MIS. The experiences of rural patients varied by race; rurality was associated with higher postoperative mortality for Black patients but not for other racial and ethnic groups.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.