Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36040675›Full record

ReviewCurrent hematologic malignancy reports2022

Value in Myeloma Care: Myth or Reality.

Evguenia Ouchveridze, Katherine Berger, Ghulam Rehman Mohyuddin

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current hematologic malignancy reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 39% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Evguenia OuchveridzeDepartment of Hematological Malignancies and Cellular Therapeutics, Suite 210, Kansas University Medical Center, 2330 Shawnee Mission Parkway, Westwood, KS, 66205, USA. jenny.ouchveridze@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5670-0186
Katherine BergerUniversity of Hartford, West Hartford, CT, USA.
Ghulam Rehman MohyuddinDivision of Hematology and Hematological Malignancies, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
Shawnee Mission Medical Center · USUniversity of Hartford · USUniversity of Utah · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewDespite tremendous advances in multiple myeloma (MM) care, the disease maintains considerable morbidity and requires long-term treatment associated with significant financial toxicity to patients and high costs to society. In this review, we explore why - despite treatment advances - value in MM treatment is largely a myth, then explain some ways the myth might become a reality. RECENT

findingsWe discuss how value-based care in MM should include patient-centered outcomes such as financial toxicity and quality of life, which are heavily impacted by cost of drugs and the indefinite duration of therapy that is standard in MM treatment. We propose multiple paths to work toward reducing cost and augmenting value of care for patients with MM, including improving access to generic drugs, increasing federal funding for clinical trials, designing more patient-centric clinical trials, and exploring the utilization of minimal residual disease (MRD)-driven treatment de-escalation, among others. We remain optimistic that despite the challenges, we can work toward making progress in the realm of value-based care for patients with MM and make it a reality.

Indexed as

Multiple MyelomaHumansNeoplasm, ResidualQuality of LifeCostFinancial toxicityMinimally residual disease (MRD)Multiple myelomaPatient centeredquality of lifeValue

Identifiers

PMID36040675
OpenAlexW4293545719

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.