Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36040613›Full record

ReviewClinical pharmacokinetics2022

Nafamostat Mesylate for Treatment of COVID-19 in Hospitalised Patients: A Structured, Narrative Review.

María Patricia Hernández-Mitre, Steven Y C Tong, Justin T Denholm, Gregory J Dore, Asha C Bowen, Sharon R Lewin, Balasubramanian Venkatesh, Thomas E Hills, Zoe McQuilten, David L Paterson and 2 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical pharmacokinetics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Aprotinin-Drug against Respiratory Diseases.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  16. Review
  17. COVID-19 and Diarylamidines: The Parasitic Connection.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 7 institutions in 3 countries.

María Patricia Hernández-MitreUQ Centre for Clinical Research, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia. p.mitre@uq.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0003-3565-0292
Steven Y C TongVictorian Infectious Disease Service, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-1368-8356
Justin T DenholmVictorian Infectious Disease Service, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-9214-6431
Gregory J DoreKirby Institute, UNSW Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-4741-2622
Asha C BowenDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Perth Children's Hospital, Perth, WA, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-3242-1155
Sharon R LewinVictorian Infectious Disease Service, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-0330-8241
Balasubramanian VenkateshIntensive Care, Princess Alexandra, and Wesley Hospital, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-2893-6954
Thomas E HillsDepartments of Immunology and Infectious Diseases, Auckland District Health Broad, Auckland, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0003-0322-5822
Zoe McQuiltenDepartment of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Clayton, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-9698-7185
David L PatersonUQ Centre for Clinical Research, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-2079-4437
Susan C MorpethMiddlemore Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0002-6131-8536
Jason A RobertsUQ Centre for Clinical Research, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-6218-435X
The University of Queensland · AUThe Royal Melbourne Hospital · AUAuckland District Health Board · NZMiddlemore Hospital · NZMonash Health · AUThe Kids Research Institute Australia · AUUNSW Sydney · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The search for clinically effective antivirals against the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) is ongoing. Repurposing of drugs licensed for non-coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) indications has been extensively investigated in laboratory models and in clinical studies with mixed results. Nafamostat mesylate (nafamostat) is a drug licensed in Japan and Korea for indications including acute pancreatitis and disseminated intravascular coagulation. It is available only for continuous intravenous infusion. In vitro human lung cell line studies with nafamostat demonstrate high antiviral potency against SARS-CoV-2 (half maximal inhibitory concentration [IC50] of 0.0022 µM [compared to remdesivir 1.3 µM]), ostensibly via inhibition of the cellular enzyme transmembrane protease serine 2 (TMPRSS2) preventing viral entry into human cells. In addition, the established antithrombotic activity is hypothesised to be advantageous given thrombosis-associated sequelae of COVID-19. Clinical reports to date are limited, but indicate a potential benefit of nafamostat in patients with moderate to severe COVID-19. In this review, we will explore the pre-clinical, pharmacokinetic and clinical outcome data presently available for nafamostat as a treatment for COVID-19. The recruitment to ongoing clinical trials is a priority to provide more robust data on the safety and efficacy of nafamostat as a treatment for COVID-19.

Indexed as

COVID-19 Drug TreatmentPancreatitisAcute DiseaseAntiviral AgentsBenzamidinesFibrinolytic AgentsGuanidinesHumansSARS-CoV-2SerineAntiviral AgentsBenzamidinesFibrinolytic AgentsGuanidinesnafamostatSerine

Identifiers

PMID36040613
PMCPMC9425784
OpenAlexW4293560904

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.