Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36040566›Full record

ReviewCurrent atherosclerosis reports2022

Extra-coronary Calcification and Cardiovascular Events: What Do We Know and Where Are We Heading?

Dixitha Anugula, Rhanderson Cardoso, Gowtham R Grandhi, Ron Blankstein, Khurram Nasir, Mouaz Al-Mallah, Dipan J Shah, Miguel Cainzos-Achirica

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current atherosclerosis reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Determinants of thoracic aortic calcification and its effects on thoracic aortic size.The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2025
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Dixitha AnugulaDivision of Cardiac Imaging, Department of Cardiology, Houston Methodist DeBakey Heart & Vascular Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Rhanderson CardosoDivision of Cardiac Imaging, Department of Cardiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Gowtham R GrandhiDepartment of Internal Medicine, MedStar Union Memorial Hospital, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Ron BlanksteinDivision of Cardiac Imaging, Department of Cardiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Khurram NasirDivision of Cardiovascular Prevention and Wellness, Department of Cardiology, Houston Methodist DeBakey Heart & Vascular Center, 6565 Fannin St Brown Bldg. B5-019, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
Mouaz Al-MallahDivision of Cardiac Imaging, Department of Cardiology, Houston Methodist DeBakey Heart & Vascular Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Dipan J ShahDivision of Cardiac Imaging, Department of Cardiology, Houston Methodist DeBakey Heart & Vascular Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Miguel Cainzos-AchiricaDivision of Cardiovascular Prevention and Wellness, Department of Cardiology, Houston Methodist DeBakey Heart & Vascular Center, 6565 Fannin St Brown Bldg. B5-019, Houston, TX, 77030, USA. miguel.cainzos@gmail.com.
Houston Methodist · USBrigham and Women's Hospital · USHarvard University · USMedStar Union Memorial Hospital · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewThe coronary artery calcium score is a guideline-endorsed aid for further risk stratification in the primary prevention of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. The non-contrast scan performed for detection of coronary artery calcium also gives an opportunity to visualize calcifications in the thoracic aorta and in the heart valves, at no additional cost or radiation exposure. The purpose of this review was to discuss the potential clinical value of measuring thoracic aortic calcification, aortic valve calcification, and mitral annulus calcification. RECENT

findingsAfter two decades of active research, all three calcifications have been extensively evaluated, across various cohorts. We discuss classic and recent studies, current knowledge gaps, and future directions in this space. The added value of these measurements has traditionally been considered modest at best, and they are not currently discussed in relevant primary prevention guidelines in North America and Europe. However, recent studies evaluating high thoracic calcification thresholds and younger populations have further enriched this space. Specifically, some studies suggest that detection of severe thoracic aortic calcification may be helpful in further risk assessment and that detection of aortic valve calcifications may have important prognostic implications in younger individuals. Although more research is needed, particularly in larger young-to-middle-aged cohorts, future guidelines might consider including these features as risk-enhancing factors.

Indexed as

Aortic Valve StenosisCalcinosisCoronary Artery DiseaseVascular CalcificationAortic ValveCalciumHumansMiddle AgedRisk FactorsCalciumCalcificationsCardiovascular diseaseComputed tomographyImagingPrimary preventionRisk assessment

Identifiers

PMID36040566
OpenAlexW4293568933

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.