ArticleMolecular biology reports2022
Characterization of Agrobacterium-mediated co-transformation events in rice using green and red fluorescent proteins.
Article in Molecular biology reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Bibliometric-Based Analysis of Global Trends and Collaborative Networks in Plant Genetic Engineering (1994-2024).Plant biotechnology journal · 2026Review
- CRISPR/Cas-mediated genome editing: playing a versatile role in mitigating the challenges of sustainable rice improvement.3 Biotech · 2025Review
- Isolation, Purification, and Application of Protoplasts and Transient Expression Systems in Plants.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundBiotechnologists seeking to develop marker-free transgenic plants have established co-transformation methods. For co-transformation using mixed Agrobacterium strains, the mix ratio of Agrobacterium strains and selection scheme may influence co-transformation frequency. This study used fluorescent GFP and RFP markers to compose different selection schemes for observation of the selective dynamics of transformed rice cells and to investigate the factors affecting co-transformation efficiency. METHODS AND
resultsWe utilized GFP and RFP markers in co-transformation and tested the combinations of an antibiotic-selectable vector (pGFP-HPT) and a single RFP vector (pRFP) and of two antibiotic-selectable vectors (pGFP-HPT and pRFP-HPT) in rice. The pGFP-HPT/pRFP combination resulted in 70.9% to 81.2% of co-transformation frequencies while lower frequencies (56.6% on average) were obtained with the pGFP-HPT/pRFP-HPT combination. Based on GFP/RFP segregation patterns, 55% of the pGFP-HPT/pRFP co-transformants contained unlinked T-DNAs and segregated single RFP progeny, which simulated the selection process of marker-free transgenic plants that carry an actual gene of interest. Transgene expression levels in the rice lines varied as revealed by RT-PCR, and tandem-linked T-DNAs were detected in co-transformants, suggesting that transgene expression might be affected by duplicated T-DNA structures.
conclusionCo-transformation via mixed Agrobacterium strains is feasible, and approximately 55% of the pGFP-HPT/pRFP co-transformants contained unlinked T-DNAs and segregated single RFP progeny. The pGFP-HPT/pRFP and the pGFP-HPT/pRFP-HPT vector combinations showed distinctive selective dynamics of transformed rice cells, suggesting that co-transformation efficiency depends on both vector system and selection scheme.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.