Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36040499›Full record

GuidelineMedizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin2022

[Intensive care of patients with [infarct-related] cardiogenic shock : Abridged version of the S1 guideline].

C Hermes, T Ochmann, Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internistische Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin e. V. (DGIIN), C Keienburg, Deutsche Gesellschaft für Fachkrankenpflege und Funktionsdienste e. V. (DGF), M Kegel, Deutsche Gesellschaft Interdisziplinäre Notfall- und Akutmedizin e. V. (DGINA), D Schindele, Deutsche Interdisziplinäre Vereinigung für Intensiv- und Notfallmedizin e. V. (DIVI), J Klausmeier and 3 more

Abstract readReviewPractice Guideline
In one paragraph

Guideline in Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Guideline
  3. [Core curriculum of intensive care and emergency medicine in internal medicine].Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. [Hemodynamic monitoring- (NOT) a nursing task?!]Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

C HermesHochschule für Angewandte Wissenschaften Hamburg (HAW Hamburg), Alexanderstraße 1, 20099, Hamburg, Deutschland. carsten.hermes@haw-hamburg.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0889-1381
T OchmannKlinik für Kardiologie, Angiologie und Internistische Intensivmedizin, kath. Marienkrankenhaus Hamburg, Hamburg, Deutschland.
Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internistische Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin e. V. (DGIIN)
C KeienburgZentrum für Kardiologie, Universitätsmedizin Mainz, Langenbeckstr. 1, 55131, Mainz, Deutschland.
Deutsche Gesellschaft für Fachkrankenpflege und Funktionsdienste e. V. (DGF)
M KegelKlinikverbund Bremen, Bildungsakademie der Gesundheit Nord gGmbH, Bremen, Deutschland.
Deutsche Gesellschaft Interdisziplinäre Notfall- und Akutmedizin e. V. (DGINA)
D SchindeleRKH Akademie, Klinikum Ludwigsburg-Bietigheim, Regionale Kliniken Holding RKH GmbH, Ludwigsburg, Deutschland.
Deutsche Interdisziplinäre Vereinigung für Intensiv- und Notfallmedizin e. V. (DIVI)
J KlausmeierContilia Institut für Pflege- und Gesundheitsberufe, St. Marien-Hospital Mülheim an der Ruhr, Mülheim an der Ruhr, Deutschland.
Deutsche Gesellschaft für Kardiologie – Herz- und Kreislaufforschung e. V. (DGK)
E AdriganAbteilung für allgemeine und internistische Intensivmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Österreich.
Österreichische Gesellschaft für Internistische und Allgemeine Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin e. V. (ÖGIAIN)

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCardiovascular diseases and (infarct-related) cardiogenic shock are among the most frequent causes of death in Germany. Adequate clinical care often poses great challenges for hospitals. The complex care of patients in a multi-professional team places high demands on all those involved in the care process. Since nurses in particular are in close contact with patients and play a decisive role in shaping and controlling therapy, a national (intensive) care guideline is urgently needed.

methodsWithin the framework of the guideline programme of the Association of the Scientific Medical Societies in Germany (AWMF), an S1 guideline was developed with the participation of six professional societies and published in May 2022. The guideline group defined relevant topics, which were processed through a systematic literature search in peer-reviewed journals. Based on the S1 classification, no separate evidence review was conducted. A formal consensus-building process was used to classify the recommendations.

resultsThe guideline contains 36 recommendations ranging from nursing care in the central emergency department to the cardiac catheterisation laboratory, intensive care unit and follow-up care. In addition, recommendations are made on the necessary qualifications and structural requirements in the respective areas in order to ensure a high-quality (nursing) care process.

conclusionThis is the first national intensive care guideline. It is aimed at nurses involved in the care of patients with (infarct-related) cardiogenic shock. The guideline is valid until 30.12.2026.

Indexed as

Critical CareShock, CardiogenicGermanyHumansPeer ReviewSocieties, MedicalAdvanced nursing practiseCritical care nurseMandatory trainingNursing scienceQuality management

Identifiers

PMID36040499
PMCPMC9468128

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.