Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36040345›Full record

Trial reportThe Journal of nutrition2023

Participant Characteristics Associated with High Responsiveness to Personalized Healthy Food Incentives: a Secondary Analysis of the Randomized Controlled Crossover Smart Cart Study.

Maya K Vadiveloo, Haley W Parker, Anne N Thorndike

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The Journal of nutrition, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03748056 (Individually-targeted Incentives, Diet Quality, and Health Outcomes Among Adults), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03748056 nacompletednot on this map

Individually-targeted Incentives, Diet Quality, and Health Outcomes Among Adults

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of Rhode IslandRan2018 to 2019Enrolled224ConditionsDiet Modification, Diet HabitArmsTargeted incentives, Nominal loyalty card discount and nutrition education
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Maya K VadivelooDepartment of Nutrition and Food Sciences, College of Health Sciences, University of Rhode Island, Kingston, RI, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0137-670X
Haley W ParkerDepartment of Nutrition and Food Sciences, College of Health Sciences, University of Rhode Island, Kingston, RI, USA.
Anne N ThorndikeDivision of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
University of Rhode Island · USHarvard University · US

Funding

Mentorship in patient-oriented research on behavioral and social determinants of cardiometabolic healthK24HL163073 · NHLBI · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI Anne N Thorndike · 2023 to 2026
$504k
NHLBI NIH HHS K24 HL163073
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPersonalized dietary behavioral interventions could be enhanced by understanding factors accounting for individual variability in dietary decisions.

objectiveThis study was a secondary analysis of the Smart Cart randomized controlled trial to determine whether participant characteristics predicted high responsiveness to personalized grocery incentives for purchasing healthy food.

methodsThis secondary analysis of a 9-mo crossover study included 192 regular shoppers (86%) from a Rhode Island supermarket. To analyze whether health, behavioral, and/or sociodemographic characteristics predicted responsiveness to a personalized grocery incentive intervention, participants were divided into 3 categories [high (n = 47), moderate (n = 50), and unresponsive (n = 95)] based on percentage changes in their Grocery Purchase Quality Index scores during the intervention versus control period calculated from sales data. We tested whether participant characteristics, including individual, household, and intervention-related factors, differed across responsiveness groups using ANOVA and whether they predicted the likelihood of being high responsive versus unresponsive or moderate responsive using logistic regression.

resultsParticipants had a mean (SD) age of 56.0 (13.8) y and were 89% female. Education, self-reported BMI, income, diet-related medical condition, food insecurity, cooking adequacy, and value consciousness differed across responsiveness categories (P < 0.1). High versus moderate and unresponsive participants increased their percentage of spending on targeted foods (P < 0.0001) and purchased fewer unique items (P = 0.01). In multinomial adjusted models, the odds of being high versus unresponsive or moderate responsive were lower for participants with a BMI (in kg/m2) <25 versus ≥25 (OR: 0.41; 95% CI: 0.19, 0.90) and higher with a diet-related medical condition present (OR: 3.75; 95% CI: 1.20, 11.8). Other characteristics were not associated with responsiveness.

conclusionsFindings demonstrated that a BMI ≥25 and having a diet-related medical condition within the household predicted high responsiveness to a personalized grocery purchasing intervention, suggesting that personalized dietary interventions may be particularly effective for households with higher health risk. This trial is registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as NCT03748056.

Indexed as

DietMotivationCross-Over StudiesFemaleFoodFood PreferencesHumansMaledietary interventiongrocery purchase qualityindividual variation in effectivenessintervention responsivenesspersonalized behavioral interventionsprecision nutritionSmart Cart Study

Identifiers

PMID36040345
PMCPMC11530363
OpenAlexW4293677427

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.