Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36040195›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA2022

A smart, practical, deep learning-based clinical decision support tool for patients in the prostate-specific antigen gray zone: model development and validation.

Sang Hun Song, Hwanik Kim, Jung Kwon Kim, Hakmin Lee, Jong Jin Oh, Sang-Chul Lee, Seong Jin Jeong, Sung Kyu Hong, Junghoon Lee, Sangjun Yoo and 6 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Sang Hun SongDepartment of Urology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, South Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-3016-0032
Hwanik KimDepartment of Urology, Hallym University Sacred Heart Hospital, Anyang, South Korea.
Jung Kwon KimDepartment of Urology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, South Korea.
Hakmin LeeDepartment of Urology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, South Korea.
Jong Jin OhDepartment of Urology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, South Korea.
Sang-Chul LeeDepartment of Urology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, South Korea.
Seong Jin JeongDepartment of Urology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, South Korea.
Sung Kyu HongDepartment of Urology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, South Korea.
Junghoon LeeDepartment of Urology, Seoul Metropolitan Government-Seoul National University Boramae Medical Center, Seoul, South Korea.
Sangjun YooDepartment of Urology, Seoul Metropolitan Government-Seoul National University Boramae Medical Center, Seoul, South Korea.
Min-Soo ChooDepartment of Urology, Seoul Metropolitan Government-Seoul National University Boramae Medical Center, Seoul, South Korea.
Min Chul ChoDepartment of Urology, Seoul Metropolitan Government-Seoul National University Boramae Medical Center, Seoul, South Korea.
Hwancheol SonDepartment of Urology, Seoul Metropolitan Government-Seoul National University Boramae Medical Center, Seoul, South Korea.
Hyeon JeongDepartment of Urology, Seoul Metropolitan Government-Seoul National University Boramae Medical Center, Seoul, South Korea.
Jungyo SuhDepartment of Urology, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, South Korea.
Seok-Soo ByunDepartment of Urology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, South Korea.
Seoul National University · KRAsan Medical Center · KRHallym University Sacred Heart Hospital · KR

Funding

Ministry of SMEs and StartupsTechnology development Program S-3074628
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveDespite efforts to improve screening and early detection of prostate cancer (PC), no available biomarker has shown acceptable performance in patients with prostate-specific antigen (PSA) gray zones. We aimed to develop a deep learning-based prediction model with minimized parameters and missing value handling algorithms for PC and clinically significant PC (CSPC). MATERIALS AND

methodsWe retrospectively analyzed data from 18 824 prostate biopsies collected between March 2003 and December 2020 from 2 databases, resulting in 12 739 cases in the PSA gray zone of 2.0-10.0 ng/mL. Dense neural network (DNN) and extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) models for PC and CSPC were developed with 5-fold cross-validation. The area under the curve of the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) was compared with that of serum PSA, PSA density, free PSA (fPSA) portion, and prostate health index (PHI).

resultsThe AUROC values in the DNN model with the imputation of missing values were 0.739 and 0.708 (PC) and 0.769 and 0.742 (CSPC) in internal and external validation, whereas those of the non-imputed dataset were 0.740 and 0.771 (PC) and 0.807 and 0.771 (CSPC), respectively. The performance of the DNN model was like that of the XGBoost model, but better than all tested clinical biomarkers for both PC and CSPC. The developed DNN model outperformed PHI, serum PSA, and percent-fPSA with or without missing value imputation. DISCUSSION: DNN models for missing value imputation can be used to predict PC and CSPC. Further validation in real-life scenarios are need to recommend for actual implementation, but the results from our study support the increasing role of deep learning analytics in the clinical setting.

conclusionsA deep learning model for PC and CSPC in PSA gray zones using minimal, routinely used clinical parameter variables and data imputation of missing values was successfully developed and validated.

Indexed as

Decision Support Systems, ClinicalDeep LearningProstatic NeoplasmsBiopsyHumansMaleProstateProstate-Specific AntigenRetrospective StudiesROC CurveProstate-Specific Antigendecision support tooldeep learningmissing value imputationprediction modelprostate cancer

Identifiers

PMID36040195
PMCPMC9552291
OpenAlexW4293567439

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.