ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2022
Tangent normalization for somatic copy-number inference in cancer genome analysis.
Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Haplotype-aware segmentation with HapASeg increases accuracy of detecting homolog-specific somatic copy number alterations.Genome biology · 2026Article
- Neural Network Method of Analysing Sensor Data to Prevent Illegal Cyberattacks.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- DAGIP: alleviating cell-free DNA sequencing biases with optimal transport.Genome biology · 2025Article
- Prognostic and therapeutic implications of tumor-restrictive type III collagen in the breast cancer microenvironment.NPJ breast cancer · 2024Article
- Conumee 2.0: enhanced copy-number variation analysis from DNA methylation arrays for humans and mice.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2024Article
- Pan-cancer patterns of somatic copy number alteration.Nature genetics · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
motivationSomatic copy-number alterations (SCNAs) play an important role in cancer development. Systematic noise in sequencing and array data present a significant challenge to the inference of SCNAs for cancer genome analyses. As part of The Cancer Genome Atlas, the Broad Institute Genome Characterization Center developed the Tangent normalization method to generate copy-number profiles using data from single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) arrays and whole-exome sequencing (WES) technologies for over 10 000 pairs of tumors and matched normal samples. Here, we describe the Tangent method, which uses a unique linear combination of normal samples as a reference for each tumor sample, to subtract systematic errors that vary across samples. We also describe a modification of Tangent, called Pseudo-Tangent, which enables denoising through comparisons between tumor profiles when few normal samples are available.
resultsTangent normalization substantially increases signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs) compared to conventional normalization methods in both SNP array and WES analyses. Tangent and Pseudo-Tangent normalizations improve the SNR by reducing noise with minimal effect on signal and exceed the contribution of other steps in the analysis such as choice of segmentation algorithm. Tangent and Pseudo-Tangent are broadly applicable and enable more accurate inference of SCNAs from DNA sequencing and array data. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: Tangent is available at https://github.com/broadinstitute/tangent and as a Docker image (https://hub.docker.com/r/broadinstitute/tangent). Tangent is also the normalization method for the copy-number pipeline in Genome Analysis Toolkit 4 (GATK4). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.