Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36040106›Full record

ReviewMuscle & nerve2023

A standardized ultrasound approach in neuralgic amyotrophy.

Natalie E Cignetti, Rebecca S Cox, Vanessa Baute, Marissa B McGhee, Nens van Alfen, Jeffrey A Strakowski, Andrea J Boon, John W Norbury, Michael S Cartwright

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Muscle & nerve, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
5.3field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. [Diaphragmatic Paralysis in Parsonage-Turner syndrome: beyond brachial neuralgia]Revista de la Facultad de Ciencias Medicas (Cordoba, Argentina) · 2025
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Neuralgic Amyotrophy.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2024
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. A case report of neuralgic amyotrophy.Frontiers in neurology · 2024
    Article
  17. Article
  18. IncreasedBMC neurology · 2023
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Natalie E CignettiDepartment of Neurology, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7021-7596
Rebecca S CoxDepartment of Neurology, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA.
Vanessa BauteDepartment of Neurology, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA.
Marissa B McGheeDepartment of Neurology, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA.
Nens van AlfenDepartment of Neurology, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-7839-8125
Jeffrey A StrakowskiOhio State Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
Andrea J BoonDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
John W NorburyDivision of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Department of Neurology, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Lubbock, Texas, USA.
Michael S CartwrightDepartment of Neurology, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2026-6511
Wake Forest University · USColumbus State Community College · USMayo Clinic · USRadboud University Nijmegen · NLTexas Tech University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neuralgic amyotrophy (NA), also referred to as idiopathic brachial plexitis and Parsonage-Turner syndrome, is a peripheral nerve disorder characterized by acute severe shoulder pain followed by progressive upper limb weakness and muscle atrophy. While NA is incompletely understood and often difficult to diagnose, early recognition may prevent unnecessary tests and interventions and, in some situations, allow for prompt treatment, which can potentially minimize adverse long-term sequalae. High-resolution ultrasound (HRUS) has become a valuable tool in the diagnosis and evaluation of NA. Pathologic HRUS findings can be grouped into four categories: nerve swelling, swelling with incomplete constriction, swelling with complete constriction, and fascicular entwinement, which may represent a continuum of pathologic processes. Certain ultrasound findings may help predict the likelihood of spontaneous recovery with conservative management versus the need for surgical intervention. We recommend relying heavily on history and physical examination to determine which nerves are clinically affected and should therefore be assessed by HRUS. The nerves most frequently affected by NA are the suprascapular, long thoracic, median and anterior interosseous nerve (AIN) branch, radial and posterior interosseous nerve (PIN) branch, axillary, spinal accessory, and musculocutaneous. When distal upper limb nerves are affected (AIN, PIN, superficial radial nerve), the lesion is almost always located in their respective fascicles within the parent nerve, proximal to its branching point. The purpose of this review is to describe a reproducible, standardized, ultrasonographic approach for evaluating suspected NA, and to share reliable techniques and clinical considerations when imaging commonly affected nerves.

Indexed as

Brachial Plexus NeuritisPeripheral Nervous System DiseasesConstriction, PathologicHumansPeripheral NervesRadial NerveShoulder Painbrachial plexushourglass constrictionneuromuscularparsonage-turner syndromeultrasound imaging

Identifiers

PMID36040106
PMCPMC10087170
OpenAlexW4293695887

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.