ArticlemBio2022
Neuroimmune Responses in a New Experimental Animal Model of Cerebral Aspergillosis.
Article in mBio, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pulmonary fibroblast activation during Aspergillus fumigatus infection enhances lung defense via immunomodulation and tissue remodeling.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Translational potential of γδ T cells in hematologic diseases: from immunobiology to therapeutic innovation.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- BTK inhibitor-induced defects in human neutrophil effector activity against Aspergillus fumigatus are restored by TNF-α.JCI insight · 2024Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Exposure of immunosuppressed individuals to the opportunistic fungal pathogen Aspergillus fumigatus may result in invasive pulmonary aspergillosis (IPA), which can lead to the development of cerebral aspergillosis (CA), a highly lethal infection localized in the central nervous system (CNS). There are no experimental models of CA that effectively mimic human disease, resulting in a considerable knowledge gap regarding mechanisms of neurological pathogenicity and neuroimmune responses during infection. In this report, immunosuppressed mice (via acute, high-dose corticosteroid administration) challenged with A. fumigatus resting conidia intranasally, followed a day later by a 70-fold lower inoculum of pre-swollen conidia intravenously (IN + IV + steroid), demonstrated increased weight loss, signs of severe clinical disease, increased fungal burden in the brain, and significant reduction in survival compared to immunosuppressed mice challenged intranasally only (IN + steroid) or non-immunosuppressed mice challenged both intranasally and intravenously (IN + IV). The IN + IV + steroid group demonstrated significant decreases in monocytes, eosinophils, dendritic cells (DCs), and invasive natural killer T (iNKT) cells, but not neutrophils or γδ T cells, in the brain compared to the IN + IV group. Likewise, the IN + IV + steroid group had significantly lower levels of interleukin (IL)-1β, IL-6, IL-17A, CC motif chemokine ligand 3 (CCL3), CXC chemokine ligand 10 (CXCL10), and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) in the brain compared to the IN + IV group. IN + IV + steroid was superior to both IN + IV + chemotherapy (cytarabine + daunorubicin) and IN + IV + neutropenia for the development of CA. In conclusion, we have developed a well-defined, physiologically relevant model of disseminated CA in corticosteroid-induced immunosuppressed mice with a primary pulmonary infection. This model will serve to advance understanding of disease mechanisms, identify immunopathogenic processes, and help define the protective neuroinflammatory response to CA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.