SynthesisEuropean journal of clinical investigation2022
Prognostic value of soluble urokinase-type plasminogen activator receptor in coronary artery disease: A meta-analysis.
Synthesis in European journal of clinical investigation, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Diagnostic value of soluble urokinase-type plasminogen activator receptor in patients with acute coronary syndrome: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Cardiology journal · 2024Pooled it
- Prognostic value of soluble urokinase-type plasminogen activator receptor in coronary artery disease: A meta-analysis.European journal of clinical investigation · 2022Pooled it
- The predictive value of CK-MB on the curative effect of urokinase combined with LMWH calcium in AMI.Biomarkers in medicine · 2024Trial
- Proteomic Mediators Linking Autoimmune Diseases to Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events: Insights from the UK Biobank.Proteomes · 2026Article
- Residual cardiovascular risk in coronary artery disease: from pathophysiology to established and novel therapies.Nature reviews. Cardiology · 2026Review
- Soluble Urokinase Plasminogen Activator Receptor as a Predictor of All-Cause Death in Patients Undergoing Coronary Angiography at 10-Year Follow-Up.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- Urokinase-Type Plasminogen Activator Receptor (uPAR) in Inflammation and Disease: A Unique Inflammatory Pathway Activator.Biomedicines · 2024Review
- Multi-proteomic Biomarker Risk Scores for Predicting Risk and Guiding Therapy in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease.Current cardiology reports · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundA potential inflammatory biomarker, soluble urokinase-type plasminogen activator receptor (suPAR) has been utilized to assist the prognostic assessment of coronary artery disease (CAD) patients; however, outcomes have been inconsistent. The prognostic relevance of suPAR as a predictor of CAD patient adverse outcomes was therefore examined.
methodsResearch articles published as of 1 January 2022 were retrieved from PubMed, Embase, the Web of Science and the Cochrane Library. All-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality and other major cardiovascular events (nonfatal myocardial infarction, heart failure or stroke) were analysed as a subset of relevant studies' results. We calculated hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for each study. The broad EQUATOR guidelines were conformed. Risk of bias was assessed with ROBINS-I tool.
resultsIn total, this analysis included nine studies including 14,738 CAD patients. All included studies made a correction for certain potential confounders. However, risk of bias ranged from moderate to critical. When the ROBINS-I tool was used. Patients with CAD that exhibited increased suPAR levels had a substantially higher risk of all-cause mortality (HR = 2.24; 95% CI 1.97-2.55) or cardiovascular mortality (HR = 2.02; 95% CI 1.58-2.58), but not of developing other major cardiovascular events (HR = 1.63; 95% CI 0.86-3.11). Considerable heterogeneity across studies was observed in our meta-analyses, but no significant publication bias was detected.
conclusionIn patients with coronary disease, suPAR may have prognostic value for both all-cause and cardiovascular mortality but not for other major cardiovascular events.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.