Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36039671›Full record

ArticleIET systems biology2022

Identifying driver modules based on multi-omics biological networks in prostate cancer.

Zhongli Chen, Biting Liang, Yingfu Wu, Haoru Zhou, Yuchen Wang, Hao Wu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in IET systems biology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 48% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Zhongli ChenTibet Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Lhasa, China.
Biting LiangSchool of Information Engineering, Northwest A&F University, Yangling, China.
Yingfu WuSchool of Information Engineering, Northwest A&F University, Yangling, China.
Haoru ZhouSchool of Information Engineering, Northwest A&F University, Yangling, China.
Yuchen WangSchool of Software, Shandong University, Jinan, China.
Hao WuSchool of Software, Shandong University, Jinan, China.ORCID 0000-0003-2340-9258
Northwest A&F University · CNShandong University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The development of sequencing technology has promoted the expansion of cancer genome data. It is necessary to identify the pathogenesis of cancer at the molecular level and explore reliable treatment methods and precise drug targets in cancer by identifying carcinogenic functional modules in massive multi-omics data. However, there are still limitations to identifying carcinogenic driver modules by utilising genetic characteristics simply. Therefore, this study proposes a computational method, NetAP, to identify driver modules in prostate cancer. Firstly, high mutual exclusivity, high coverage, and high topological similarity between genes are integrated to construct a weight function, which calculates the weight of gene pairs in a biological network. Secondly, the random walk method is utilised to reevaluate the strength of interaction among genes. Finally, the optimal driver modules are identified by utilising the affinity propagation algorithm. According to the results, the authors' method identifies more validated driver genes and driver modules compared with the other previous methods. Thus, the proposed NetAP method can identify carcinogenic driver modules effectively and reliably, and the experimental results provide a powerful basis for cancer diagnosis, treatment and drug targets.

Indexed as

Prostatic NeoplasmsHumansMale

Identifiers

PMID36039671
PMCPMC9675413
OpenAlexW4293593474

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.