ArticleiScience2022
The costs of replacing coal plant jobs with local instead of distant wind and solar jobs across the United States.
Article in iScience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evaluating socio-economic and subjective well-being impacts of coal power phaseout in China.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Location is a major barrier for transferring US fossil fuel employment to green jobs.Nature communications · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To further a just energy transition, jobs lost at retiring coal plants could be replaced by jobs at wind and solar plants. No research quantifies the feasibility and costs of such an undertaking across the United States. Complicating such an undertaking are workers' place-based preferences that could prevent them from moving long distances, e.g. to high renewable resource regions. We formulate a bottom-up optimization model to quantify the technical feasibility and costs of replacing coal plant jobs with local versus distant jobs in the renewables sector. For the contiguous United States, we find replacing coal generation and employment with local wind and solar investments is feasible. Siting renewables local to instead of distant from retiring coal plants increases replacement costs by 5%-33% across sub-national regions and by $83 billion, or 24%, across the United States. These costs are modest relative to overall energy transition costs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.