Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36039280›Full record

ArticleRoyal Society open science2022

Biomechanical effects of the addition of a precision constraint on a collective load carriage task.

Nour Sghaier, Guillaume Fumery, Vincent Fourcassié, Nicolas A Turpin, Pierre Moretto

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Royal Society open science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Nour SghaierCentre de Recherches Sur La Cognition Animale, Centre de Biologie Intégrative, Université de Toulouse, CRCA, UMR CNRS-UPS 5169, 118 Route de Narbonne, 31062 Toulouse, France.
Guillaume FumeryCentre de Recherches Sur La Cognition Animale, Centre de Biologie Intégrative, Université de Toulouse, CRCA, UMR CNRS-UPS 5169, 118 Route de Narbonne, 31062 Toulouse, France.
Vincent FourcassiéCentre de Recherches Sur La Cognition Animale, Centre de Biologie Intégrative, Université de Toulouse, CRCA, UMR CNRS-UPS 5169, 118 Route de Narbonne, 31062 Toulouse, France.ORCID 0000-0002-3605-6351
Nicolas A TurpinIRISSE Lab (EA 4075), UFR SHE, Sport Sciences Department (STAPS), Université de La Réunion, 117, rue du général Ailleret, 97430 le Tampon, France.
Pierre MorettoCentre de Recherches Sur La Cognition Animale, Centre de Biologie Intégrative, Université de Toulouse, CRCA, UMR CNRS-UPS 5169, 118 Route de Narbonne, 31062 Toulouse, France.ORCID 0000-0002-3216-0290
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Team lifting is a complex and collective motor task comprising motor and cognitive components. The purpose of this research is to investigate how individual and collective performances are impacted during load transport combined with a cognitive task. Ten dyads performed a first condition in which they transported a load (CC), and a second one in which they transported the load while maintaining a ball on its top (PC). The recovery-rate, amplitude and period of the centre-of-mass (COM) trajectory were computed for the system (dyad + table = PACS). We analysed the forces and moments exerted at each joint of the upper limbs of the participants. We observed a decrease in the overall performance of the dyads during PC: (i) the velocity and amplitude of CoM

Indexed as

collective behaviourdual taskergonomicsload carriageprecision taskteam lifting

Identifiers

PMID36039280
PMCPMC9399703
OpenAlexW4293213733

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.