ArticleCureus2022
An Unusual Tale of Two Appendices in a Case of Acute Appendicitis: One Gangrenous, One Inflamed.
Article in Cureus, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Perforated anterior tenia coli-type appendicitis in a case of vermiform appendix duplex in a toddler: a case report.Journal of surgical case reports · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Appendicectomy is one of the most common surgeries performed worldwide. The incidence of acute appendicitis is higher among adolescents and young adults. Though various positions of the appendix, such as retrocecal, pelvic, subcecal, pre- or post-ileal, and their clinical implications have been well established, appendiceal anomalies like duplication or triplication of the appendix are yet to receive attention due to their very low incidence. We report an incidental finding of a duplicated appendix in a 19-year-old girl who presented with features of acute appendicitis. What makes this case report an interesting learning point for young surgeons is the identification of a perforated appendix with gangrene at the tip, along with an inflamed duplicated appendix. This report alerts us to the need for a thorough intraoperative inspection, to look for possible anatomical abnormalities, and to take the right management decisions to avoid unnecessary re-explorations. While operating a patient with features of acute appendicitis, a failure to identify a duplicated appendix is comparable to abandoning an inflamed appendix in-situ. Such instances not only increase the morbidity due to complications like the formation of pelvic abscesses, wound dehiscence, and surgical site infection, but also cause mortality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.