ArticleCureus2022
X-ray and MRI Correlation of Bone Tumors Using Histopathology As Gold Standard.
Article in Cureus, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Global research trends in bone tumors: a bibliometric analysis of medical imaging.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Pooled it
- Article
- Clinical and Radiological Concordance of Bone Tumours Using Histopathology as the Gold Standard: A Pilot Study.Cureus · 2026Article
- Tracking temporal progression of benign bone tumors through X-ray based detection and segmentation.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Ultrasound features of periosteal abnormalities in children.Journal of medical ultrasonics (2001) · 2025Review
- Artificial intelligence and machine learning applications for the imaging of bone and soft tissue tumors.Frontiers in radiology · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction Bone tumors are a common pathology of the musculoskeletal system being frequently encountered by clinicians. Radiological workup is a mainstay in the diagnostic workup of bone tumors. This study aimed to highlight the importance of plain radiography and MRI in the diagnosis of bone tumors keeping histopathology as a gold standard. It is a descriptive validation study conducted in the Radiology Department of Pakistan Institute of Medical Sciences Islamabad. Methodology The study included 92 patients with suspected bone lesions. After taking a complete history and receiving informed written consent. X-rays radiographs and magnetic resonance imaging were performed. X-ray radiograph and magnetic resonance imaging parameters were recorded and compared with the histopathology of lesions as a standard. Results The mean age of patients was 30.50 ± 8.95 years. Of 92 patients examined on X-ray, 51 (55.4%) had lytic lesions, 34 (37.0%) had sclerotic lesions, and seven (7.6 %) had mixed lesions. MRI revealed the location of the lesion. There were 25 (27.2%) bone lesions in diaphysis, 19 (20.7%) in metaphysis, nine (9.8%) at meta-diaphysis, and 32 (34.8 %) in the meta-epiphyseal region. These findings were later on confirmed with histopathological results. Conclusion MRI can differentiate soft-tissue components and periosteal reactions. An X-ray radiograph can provide information about bony matrix and calcifications within tumors. After analysis of imaging findings and histopathological results, it is concluded that these modalities can be used to diagnose bone tumors with high diagnostic accuracy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.