Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36039233›Full record

ArticleCureus2022

Clinical Reporting of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, the Way Forward for Patients With Lumbar Disc Herniation: A Prospective Correlational Study.

Ramavtar Saini, Anshu Sharma, Mirant B Dave

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ramavtar SainiOrthopaedics, Geetanjali Medical College and Hospital, Udaipur, IND.
Anshu SharmaOrthopaedics, Geetanjali Medical College and Hospital, Udaipur, IND.
Mirant B DaveOrthopaedics, Geetanjali Medical College and Hospital, Udaipur, IND.
Rabindranath Tagore Medical College · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background Lower back pain (LBP) is a major cause of increasing years lived with disability. Many adults suffer from LBP once in their lifetime. Multiple environmental, genetic, and acquired factors lead to disc degeneration. Spinal stenosis can be caused due to bony, ligamentous, or discogenic origin. The majority of cases have a combined etiology of bony, ligamentous, and disc disease. Lumbar disc disease (LDD) has been mentioned by various terminologies in the literature. A standardized nomenclature is needed for better research and communication. Our study is based on the correlation between lumbar disc herniation (LDH) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings. Methodology A prospective observational study was undertaken on patients presenting with signs and symptoms suggestive of LDD to the Department of Orthopaedics at a tertiary care hospital in southern Rajasthan. The purposive sampling technique with a consecutive scheme was used. MRI is a valuable tool for diagnosing LDH. Results Many studies have concluded false-positive results for MRI in cases of LDH. Hence, interpretation with grading systems (Pfirrmann's and Scizas grading) and correlation with clinical findings are mandatory for accurate diagnosis and management of patients. Conclusions We suggest clinicians adopt clinical reporting of MRI to improve the diagnostic accuracy with clinical and radiological correlation. Reporting can guide professionals in deciding the course of treatment in the form of conservative or surgical management.

Indexed as

clinical reportinglumbar disc degenerationlumbar disc diseasemri spinespine examination

Identifiers

PMID36039233
PMCPMC9400709
OpenAlexW4287447984

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.