Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36039207›Full record

ArticleCureus2022

Rule and Neural Network-Based Image Segmentation of Mice Vertebrae Images.

Indeever Madireddy, Tongge Wu

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 53% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Indeever MadireddyComputer Science, BASIS Independent Silicon Valley, San Jose, USA.
Tongge WuDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University of California, Berkeley, USA.
Silicon Valley Independent Living Center · USSilicon Valley University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background Image segmentation is a fundamental technique that allows researchers to process images from various sources into individual components for certain applications, such as visual or numerical evaluations. Image segmentation is beneficial when studying medical images for healthcare purposes. However, existing semantic image segmentation models like the U-net are computationally intensive. This work aimed to develop less complicated models that could still accurately segment images. Methodology Rule-based and linear layer neural network models were developed in Mathematica and trained on mouse vertebrae micro-computed tomography scans. These models were tasked with segmenting the cortical shell from the whole bone image. A U-net model was also set up for comparison. Results It was found that the linear layer neural network had comparable accuracy to the U-net model in segmenting the mice vertebrae scans. Conclusions This work provides two separate models that allow for automated segmentation of mouse vertebral scans, which could be potentially valuable in applications such as pre-processing the murine vertebral scans for further evaluations of the effect of drug treatment on bone micro-architecture.

Indexed as

boneimagemachine learningmousesegmentation

Identifiers

PMID36039207
PMCPMC9401637
OpenAlexW4287832303

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.