Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36039175›Full record

ArticleRevista de psiquiatria y salud mental

The impact of COVID-19 pandemic on the psychological well-being among health care workers: A 6-month cohort longitudinal survey study.

Manuel Canal-Rivero, Cristian Montes-García, Nathalia Garrido-Torres, Amanda Moreno-Mellado, Pablo Reguera-Pozuelo, Miguel Ruiz-Veguilla, Benedicto Crespo-Facorro

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Revista de psiquiatria y salud mental. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Manuel Canal-RiveroUniversity Hospital Virgen del Rocio-IBIS (Universidad de Sevilla, HUVR, Junta de Andalucía, CSIC), Seville, Spain.
Cristian Montes-GarcíaUniversity Hospital Virgen del Rocio-IBIS (Universidad de Sevilla, HUVR, Junta de Andalucía, CSIC), Seville, Spain.
Nathalia Garrido-TorresUniversity Hospital Virgen del Rocio-IBIS (Universidad de Sevilla, HUVR, Junta de Andalucía, CSIC), Seville, Spain.
Amanda Moreno-MelladoUniversity Hospital Virgen del Rocio-IBIS (Universidad de Sevilla, HUVR, Junta de Andalucía, CSIC), Seville, Spain.
Pablo Reguera-PozueloUniversity Hospital Virgen del Rocio-IBIS (Universidad de Sevilla, HUVR, Junta de Andalucía, CSIC), Seville, Spain.
Miguel Ruiz-VeguillaUniversity Hospital Virgen del Rocio-IBIS (Universidad de Sevilla, HUVR, Junta de Andalucía, CSIC), Seville, Spain.
Benedicto Crespo-FacorroUniversity Hospital Virgen del Rocio-IBIS (Universidad de Sevilla, HUVR, Junta de Andalucía, CSIC), Seville, Spain.
Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Salud Mental · ESInstituto de Salud Carlos III · ESSpanish Clinical Research Network · ESUniversidad de Sevilla · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Health care workers (HCW) have been identified as a risk group to suffer psychological burden derived from Coronavirus Disease 19 (COVID-19) pandemic. In addition, possible gender differences in the emotional reactions derived from COVID-19 pandemic have been suggested in this population. The aims of the study were to explore the impact of COVID-19 as well as possible gender differences on mental health status and suicidality in a cohort of HCW. Materials and methods: One thousand four hundred and thirty-two HCW responded to an online survey including sociodemographic, clinical, and psychometric tests in May 2020 while 251 HCW answered in November 2020. Mental health status was measured by General Health Questionnaire 28 (GHQ-28) in both time periods. Results: HCW informed of a worsening in somatic symptomatology over the follow up period. Gender differences were found in all GHQ-28 dimensions as well in the total score of the questionnaire. Post hoc analyses displayed significant interaction between the time and gender in somatic and anxiety dimensions as well as in GHQ-28 total score. Stress produced by COVID-19 spreading and the feeling of being overwhelmed at work resulted the main predictors of psychological distress although each domain is characterized by a specific set of predictors. Conclusions: Somatic reactions represent the most sensitive dimension over the follow-up period. Moreover, women are characterized by a greater psychological distress at the beginning, although these differences tend to disappear over time. Finally, a complex network of factors predicted different dimensions of psychological distress, showing the complexity of prevention in high-risk populations facing major disasters.

Indexed as

COVID-19GHQ-28Health-care workers

Identifiers

PMID36039175
PMCPMC9400377
OpenAlexW4293011269

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.